UK tax authority arrests carbon fraud suspects
The UK's tax authority HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has arrested seven people on the suspicion of a £38 million VAT fraud involving the trading of carbon emissions allowances.
LONDON - The seven people, suspected of perpetrating VAT carousel fraud on carbon credits in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS), were arrested in the Gravesend and Greater London areas and 27 properties, both business and residential, were searched in early morning raids yesterday.
VAT carousel fraud occurs when goods are imported VAT-free and then sold on to domestic buyers at a price that includes VAT. The perpetrators then disappear without paying the tax to the government.
The UK government recently introduced a zero-rate of tax on carbon transactions in an attempt to tackle this type of fraud. The decision followed similar moves in Europe. In July, France's carbon exchange BlueNext saw an unexpected spike in volumes, which raised suspicions of fraudulent practices. As a result, the exchange introduced a zero-rating on carbon tax. A similar spike in volumes at Dutch carbon exchange Climex then prompted its government to implement a 'reverse charge mechanism' whereby the buyer is charged VAT rather than the seller.
Les Beaumont, deputy director of criminal investigation for HMRC, says the new zero-rating on carbon tax should prevent similar incidences in the future. "The government took decisive action to prevent this type of fraud recurring by zero-rating carbon credits for VAT," he says. "We always aim to recover the proceeds of crime, restoring that money to the public purse where it belongs. That is our intention in this and all similar cases."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
BNP Paribas exec fears data drought from market’s IMA cuts
Vendors may not step up with critical inputs to support internal models under FRTB
Hong Kong rationalises swaps reporting requirements
Some duplicate fields removed, but framework still more granular than other jurisdictions
The curious case of the revealing orders
Oxford academics have found evidence pointing to collusion on a European exchange, but market-makers aren’t wholly convinced
FDIC’s McKernan wants single capital stack in Basel III endgame
Rebuffing Barr’s offer of a partial rollback, Republican director also targets op risk framework
European banks search for consensus on credit spread risk
New EBA guidelines spawn diverging interpretations of which products must be assessed for CSRBB
Dutch regulator in new push on algo manipulation
AFM teams up with Oxford Uni academics to develop data models that will identify “harmful” activity in automated trading
Fed relief plan for G-Sib agency clearing welcomed
Rollback may revive interest in European FCM model, as principal clearing still treated punitively
Indian initial margin launch brings operational headaches
Conglomerates with multiple entities trading derivatives pose compliance challenges for dealers