Editor’s letter
Paul Lyon paul.lyon@incisivemedia.com +44 (0)20 7484 9802
If recent announcements are anything to go by, structured products are making increasingly important contributions to the bottom lines of investment banks. Earlier this month, for example, HSBC said its pre-tax profits increased by more than a third year on year to a record $19.4 billion, but revenue from sales of structured products increased by nearly 70% compared with 2003.
Meanwhile, the Royal Bank of Canada announced plans to expand its structured products business in its 2004 results statement. And the American Stock Exchange (Amex) lauded its structured products businesses in its 2004 results statement. Amex listed 115 new structured products for a total of 325 structured products trading at the end of 2004 and also welcomed two new structured products issuers: Amherst Securities Group and Merrill Lynch Depositor.
So everything looks rosy. Or does it? As always, there are a few problems on the horizon. As we report on page 38, Italian regulators appear to be adding to a general distrust of structured products in the country by labouring over which regulator, Consob or the Banca d’Italia, should have ultimate control over the industry.
But some institutions seem to get on famously with their regulators. Jean-Hubert Blanchet, La Poste’s head of structured products, says that the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) is doing a sterling job: “There is good level of protection for investors; one of the fairest in Europe,” he says. This is despite the fact that the AMF is currently considering prosecuting the French post office for alleged mis-selling.
I hope you enjoy our ‘Focus on France’, the first in a series of special reports dedicated to different regions. Next month we will report on the North American market. Again, regulation appears to be a hot topic. Last month, for example, Canadian securities regulators gave Toronto-based Portus Alternative Asset Management a temporary restraining order, preventing the firm from gathering assets. Could the order be related to the firm’s issuance of structured products, and are there any other regulatory suspicions about the development of the structured products market in Canada or the US? Find out in April.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos