US senator voices concerns over Basel II in senate committee hearing
Senator Tim Johnson (Democrat, South Dakota) slammed aspects of Basel II in a US Senate committee on banking, housing and urban affairs yesterday for its regulatory burden on banks and claimed that the revised accord would stymie US competitiveness.
“Basel II was intended to create a risk-based capital regime. However, because of what I presume are political compromises, the latest draft would impose a heavy regulatory burden on large banks, while ironically, reducing their competitiveness in the global marketplace… While safety and soundness of our insured depositories is, of course, paramount, the last thing we should be doing is making it harder for American banks to compete, both home and abroad,” he said.
Johnson also slated aspects of the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) on Basel II that he says contain loopholes to exempt industrial loan companies (ILCs). ILCs are financial institutions that may be owned by non-financial institutions, and have been a source of controversy in the US due to different and lower standards of regulation. The loophole was allowed to exist to assist very small companies, but has warranted further investigation as firms such as Wal-Mart have made moves to exploit its benefits.
“In my view, any insured depository institution which has a significant volume and value of transactions that could directly or indirectly affect the payments system, should be required to capitalise that risk. Operational risk is not a function of the nature of the parent company; it is a function of the scale and complexity of the activity taking place inside of the insured depository institutions,” said Johnson.
Johnson’s criticisms were expressed while the NPR for Basel II is being reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget, and could still be changed prior to its publication in the Federal Register. The hearing preceded Sheila Bair’s nomination to become chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hopes rise for EU re-entry to UK swaps market
EC says discussions on draft decision softening derivatives trading obligation are ‘advanced’
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns