
US senator voices concerns over Basel II in senate committee hearing
“Basel II was intended to create a risk-based capital regime. However, because of what I presume are political compromises, the latest draft would impose a heavy regulatory burden on large banks, while ironically, reducing their competitiveness in the global marketplace… While safety and soundness of our insured depositories is, of course, paramount, the last thing we should be doing is making it harder for American banks to compete, both home and abroad,” he said.
Johnson also slated aspects of the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) on Basel II that he says contain loopholes to exempt industrial loan companies (ILCs). ILCs are financial institutions that may be owned by non-financial institutions, and have been a source of controversy in the US due to different and lower standards of regulation. The loophole was allowed to exist to assist very small companies, but has warranted further investigation as firms such as Wal-Mart have made moves to exploit its benefits.
“In my view, any insured depository institution which has a significant volume and value of transactions that could directly or indirectly affect the payments system, should be required to capitalise that risk. Operational risk is not a function of the nature of the parent company; it is a function of the scale and complexity of the activity taking place inside of the insured depository institutions,” said Johnson.
Johnson’s criticisms were expressed while the NPR for Basel II is being reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget, and could still be changed prior to its publication in the Federal Register. The hearing preceded Sheila Bair’s nomination to become chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
SEC criticised for belt-and-braces ban on volume-based pricing
Legal experts question need for rules to prevent firms disguising agency trades as proprietary
SEC expected to protect CRT in conflicts of interest rule
Decision could come as early as today; high hopes for credit risk transfer exemption
FRTB managers face hard facts about risk factors
There are ways to reduce the capital charges caused by NMRFs, but they come at a price
SEC official defends delayed dealer registration rule
Regulator says market should be treated like equities, but PTFs warn it will harm market liquidity
New UK clearing rules: same as the old rules?
Clearing experts doubt UK regulation can diverge significantly from Emir and global standards
SEC to delay US Treasury clearing mandate, dealer rule
A final vote on proposed US Treasury market reforms is now expected in early 2024
BoE warns against use of stablecoins in banking
Tokenised payment systems pose compliance and systemic risks, regulator says
Industry unsure of SEC’s new short-selling transparency rule
Requirement aims to provide sufficient transparency while protecting traders from a GameStop-style backlash