Editor's letter
Gazprom has started the year collecting more bad press. Russia is now being branded an 'energy bully' in the mainstream papers for supply issues with Ukraine and Georgia. Oliver Holtaway's article on page 10 cuts through some of the hype to ask what Gazprom's European customers think.
Assessing political risk is never easy, but merely demanding that Europe diversify away from dependency on Russian gas is not a practical solution in the short term. Admitting dependence and addressing political relations with Russia would appear to be the most sensible first step.
The increasing globalisation of today's energy markets is a dominant theme of 2006, and this is reflected in this year's Commodity Rankings. We received more votes this year than ever before. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley once again emerged as the giants of energy trading, with Icap and TFS leading the brokers' rankings.
Judging by the number of votes alone, markets such as emissions trading and Eastern European electricity are attracting more interest. This year's survey included for the first time a category on structured products, where competition between banks to produce innovative and bespoke product offerings is rife.
Overall, the rankings reflect the increased interest and number of players in the market, and, although this makes for fierce competition, most players welcome this.
Of course, the larger market size has specific implications for credit managers, and this is addressed in our Credit Risk supplement, a collection of articles looking at this important area from four different angles.
stella.farrington@incisivemedia.com +44 20 7968 4610.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Imminent US shake-up of LCR slated to include discount window
Adding Fed liquidity facility to bank regulation may help overcome stigma, raise lending capacity
French regulator wants permanent changes to EU’s output floor
Push for capital relief faces resistance from supervisors in Finland and the Netherlands
Council plans take Aquis, BME out of Esma oversight
German push to exempt Deutsche Börse catches three others, according to sources
Why watering down resolution plans is a bad idea
Bank failures are inevitable; banking crises are not
BIS’s Hernández de Cos on AI, non-bank risk and tokenisation
General manager talks about how the BIS is navigating a complex global environment
‘European SEC’ no silver bullet for growth
EU policymakers hope a single, centralised supervisor will help rev up Europe’s economy but critics are mustering
Permanent FRTB reforms seen as vital for IMA adoption
Temporary relief granted in June has done little to encourage internal model use in Europe
How to ensure the next Credit Suisse or SVB fails ‘well’
Regulators are planning changes to resolution rules after criticism that living wills were ignored in previous bank collapses