Editor's letter
Gazprom has started the year collecting more bad press. Russia is now being branded an 'energy bully' in the mainstream papers for supply issues with Ukraine and Georgia. Oliver Holtaway's article on page 10 cuts through some of the hype to ask what Gazprom's European customers think.
Assessing political risk is never easy, but merely demanding that Europe diversify away from dependency on Russian gas is not a practical solution in the short term. Admitting dependence and addressing political relations with Russia would appear to be the most sensible first step.
The increasing globalisation of today's energy markets is a dominant theme of 2006, and this is reflected in this year's Commodity Rankings. We received more votes this year than ever before. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley once again emerged as the giants of energy trading, with Icap and TFS leading the brokers' rankings.
Judging by the number of votes alone, markets such as emissions trading and Eastern European electricity are attracting more interest. This year's survey included for the first time a category on structured products, where competition between banks to produce innovative and bespoke product offerings is rife.
Overall, the rankings reflect the increased interest and number of players in the market, and, although this makes for fierce competition, most players welcome this.
Of course, the larger market size has specific implications for credit managers, and this is addressed in our Credit Risk supplement, a collection of articles looking at this important area from four different angles.
stella.farrington@incisivemedia.com +44 20 7968 4610.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos