
Editor's Letter
Last month's conviction of Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling on charges relating to the collapse of Enron felt like another important landmark on the road to recovery for energy trading. The 'end of Enron effect' certainly added to the general sense of optimism that was unmissable in Houston last month when the Energy Risk team travelled there for Energy Risk USA 2006. With more than 300 attendees, it was our biggest event since Enron's collapse.
Energy Risk events are, I was told by many conference delegates, viewed as something of a barometer for the health of the energy trading industry, so we were not the only ones delighted with the high attendance. Like everyone at the conference, we also hope it is a good indicator of how well the market is picking up again.
Not only has the worst of the Enron effect now been well and truly absorbed by the market, but the market is arguably stronger as a result. The integration of the Enron diaspora around the market in the months and years after its fall undoubtedly benefited the market as a whole as well.
But recently there has been a new development - the re- emergence of the energy merchant model in smaller, privately-run companies. These discrete centres of Enronian-style genius spread around the market have the potential to take the industry in some very exciting directions. And it's important that they be allowed to do so. When trying to protect against a repeat of the Enron catastrophe it's crucial that the brilliance of Enron is not overshadowed or muddled up with the fraud case. The baby mustn't be thrown out with the bath water.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU banks fear Brexit battle over FRTB internal models
Bank of England approach looks easier, but that may not make much difference to model uptake
Europe’s new IRRBB test: the riddle with no answer
A proposed compromise on net interest income test is not scientific, but exact calibration may be impossible
Eurex clearing chief calls for active account carve-outs
Isda AGM: Müller says EU clearing thresholds should exempt market-making and US client trades
The regulator that troubleshoots first, asks questions later
Canada’s bank watchdog aims to intervene early to tackle burgeoning risks, even at the expense of “perfect” regulatory decisions
Banks dispute EBA’s new threshold for IRRBB test
Banks say new proposal for identifying outliers on net interest income is still too severe
Investor wish-list offers no quick fix for Swiss CoCos
Some want bond doc overhaul to clarify bail-in risk, but sovereigns can always change the rules
SVB failure signals Fed’s need for a speed rethink
Rapid transition to large-bank bracket left supervisors flat footed on rate risk
Doubts mount over BoE proposal to dilute bank liquidity rules
Before SVB collapse, UK suggested loosening NSFR reporting for smaller banks