Editor's letter
Indeed the idols I have loved so long
Have done my credit in men's eye much wrong:
Have drowned my honour in a shallow cup,
And sold my reputation for a song.
It's a safe bet that the 13th century Persian poet Omar Khayyam didn't have Northern Rock in mind when he wrote these words but they could apply to the beleaguered bank's board. We learnt at the end of October that more than £20bn of public money had been devoted to the former building society - essentially to cover the cost of chief executive Adam Applegarth's aggressive plans for growth.
Northern Rock became Britain's fifth largest mortgage lender - and Applegarth expected it to become the third largest in a couple of years - by abandoning a traditional business model and tapping the money markets. When the liquidity crisis hit, deposits from high street customers represented a paltry 25% of its funding. This would be a private affair for the bank's customers and shareholders were it not for the government's massive commitment to support it with public money.
Criticism of EU regulations, or how they've been gold-plated, is reasonable, as is concern about the tripartite system of regulation, but the bank's overreliance on one source of funding, the wholesale market, is at the root of this costly and damaging episode. There were concerns about the former chairman Matt Ridley's business credentials before his resignation, and Applegarth, as he publicly admitted to the Treasury Select Committee, is not a qualified banker. Non-executive director Sir Derek Wanless told the Committee that the bank's stress tests were sufficient, as there was no indication in May that the markets would close in the way they did. But if the aggressive pursuit of growth hadn't led him to forget the merits of diversification, it would matter less to the bank that they have. More heads should roll.
Matthew Attwood, Editor.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma denies need for new competitiveness mandate
MEP wants explicit requirement; Esma official says it’s already covered in existing rulebook
US regulators cut FRTB’s IMA capital hit by 59%, Isda finds
Trade body pushes for further changes to cross-product netting, default risk charge
US FRTB glitch could spit out negative capital charges
Effort to recognise risk diversification between IMA and standardised approach went too far
Euronext, LCH back Esma as exchange super-regulator
National oversight hurts Europe, exchange officials say – but some are not ready to accept a single watchdog
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive