
Editor's Letter
As Credit went to press, the financial press was abuzz, yet again, with the question of regulation. Timothy Geithner, president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, is the latest to enter the fray, insisting in a speech to the Economic Club of New York that "globally active" financial institutions must operate within a single framework providing "stronger consolidated supervision, with appropriate requirements for capital and liquidity".
Clearly some kind of regulatory change is required in the light of the turmoil in credit. This is especially evident in the UK given the debacle resulting from the tripartite regulatory system's failure to contain Northern Rock, and Geithner - whose awareness of the need for central banks to act decisively is matched by his concern about moral hazard - is well placed to suggest what forms it might take. Yet reform in the wake of obvious failings, however necessary, will not equip regulators to prevent, or even predict, the next crisis in the financial system.
No-one I've spoken to has ever suggested that regulators can ever be anything other than one step - at least - behind the markets. This is due to the nature of the system: bankers are, often, paid to innovate, while regulators are there to ensure they do so fairly. It's also a question of personnel: for example, many senior market participants believe some enhanced oversight of the rating agencies is desirable, but who would suggest that anyone at a regulator is capable of suggesting even the most basic methodology changes?
Tim Geithner's views are essential, but we need to hear more from the banks and their clients about how they want the rules of engagement to change in the wake of nearly a year of turmoil.
Unless they are more vocal, the initiative will remain with the regulators.
Matthew Attwood.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU banks ‘will play for time’ in stand-off over India’s CCPs
Lawyers say banks are unlikely to set up subsidiaries and will instead pin hopes on revised Emir fix
ECB mulls intervention on uneven banking book reporting
Inconsistency among EU banks on whether deposits and loans are in scope for credit spread risk
Iosco warns of leveraged loan ‘vulnerabilities’
As recovery rates plummet, report calls for clearer covenants and more transparency on addbacks
Narrow path to compromise on EU’s post-Brexit clearing rules
Lawmakers unlikely to support industry demand to delete Emir active accounts proposal altogether
The Fed’s stress test models are inaccurate. Something has to change
First step for US regulator to improve its bank loss forecasts would be to open up its models to public scrutiny, argue two banking industry advocates
Bankers call for overhaul of EBA stress tests
Support for multiple scenarios, but only if fixed assumptions and variables are scaled back
CFTC plan to relax MMF margin restriction sparks debate
Industry welcomes proposal to lift ban on repo-using funds as eligible IM, but some warn MMFs bring risks
Legal challenges loom for renewed US focus on Sifis
Lawyers say any FSOC attempt to designate systemic non-banks risks a repeat of MetLife case