
Editor's Letter
As Credit went to press, the financial press was abuzz, yet again, with the question of regulation. Timothy Geithner, president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, is the latest to enter the fray, insisting in a speech to the Economic Club of New York that "globally active" financial institutions must operate within a single framework providing "stronger consolidated supervision, with appropriate requirements for capital and liquidity".
Clearly some kind of regulatory change is required in the light of the turmoil in credit. This is especially evident in the UK given the debacle resulting from the tripartite regulatory system's failure to contain Northern Rock, and Geithner - whose awareness of the need for central banks to act decisively is matched by his concern about moral hazard - is well placed to suggest what forms it might take. Yet reform in the wake of obvious failings, however necessary, will not equip regulators to prevent, or even predict, the next crisis in the financial system.
No-one I've spoken to has ever suggested that regulators can ever be anything other than one step - at least - behind the markets. This is due to the nature of the system: bankers are, often, paid to innovate, while regulators are there to ensure they do so fairly. It's also a question of personnel: for example, many senior market participants believe some enhanced oversight of the rating agencies is desirable, but who would suggest that anyone at a regulator is capable of suggesting even the most basic methodology changes?
Tim Geithner's views are essential, but we need to hear more from the banks and their clients about how they want the rules of engagement to change in the wake of nearly a year of turmoil.
Unless they are more vocal, the initiative will remain with the regulators.
Matthew Attwood.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
How Finma milked Credit Suisse’s CoCos to close UBS deal
An unusual clause in Swiss AT1 bonds allowed them to be written off, but could others follow suit?
US banks race against time as Fed plays climate catch-up
Long-awaited US climate risk exercise puts tough pressure on banks’ data and models
EU banks need ‘billions’ in hedges to pass new NII test
Declines in net interest income can be hedged, but the markets may struggle to handle the demand
CFTC chair gloomy over crypto legislation prospects
FIA Boca 2023: Behnam also asks Congress to grant more powers to regulate third-party tech providers
Missing Basel metric could have revealed SVB risks
US regulators did not implement economic value of equity test that SVB failed badly in 2021
Strict term SOFR trading rules ‘permanent’ says Fed’s Bowman
Official says restrictions on use of term SOFR swaps “should not be expected to change”
Esma still wants more tools to tackle clearing crises
Even after Emir 3 draft, EU regulator would like more powers over both foreign and domestic CCPs