NAB revises FX options losses to A$360 million
National Australia Bank (NAB) has revised its pre-tax losses arising from unauthorised foreign exchange options trading to A$360 million ($277.4 million), double last week’s initial estimate.
“We have worked as quickly as possible to identify all of the losses arising from the foreign currency options trading accurately,” said NAB chief executive Frank Cicutto, adding that an external auditor had confirmed the revaluation of the trading portfolio. “We will ensure that our ongoing position will be managed in a prudent and conservative manner.”
Last week, Cicutto admitted that four forex options traders had exploited “weaknesses” in the bank’s internal procedures, adding that these flaws had now been eliminated. The bank is currently conducting a full investigation into the unauthorised trades, which centred on Australian dollar and New Zealand dollar options, while the country’s regulator, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, is conducting a separate review of NAB’s risk management controls. The results from NAB’s internal inquiry should be completed by the end of February, the bank said.
Nonetheless, dealers continue to express surprise that NAB’s internal controls hadn’t flagged the unauthorised trades earlier. The rogue trading spanned three months, starting last October. “It’s incredibly difficult to hide A$360 million in options losses,” said one dealer, asking not to be named. “It’s difficult to see how this was missed.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”