Derivatives volumes soar in US, says OCC
Notional derivatives volumes held by US commercial banks increased by $3.8 trillion in second-quarter 2002, to $50.1 trillion - the second highest amount ever recorded, the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) reported yesterday in its quarterly Bank Derivatives Report.
The OCC also reported that earnings attributable to the trading of cash instruments and derivatives activities increased by $225 million in the three-month period, to $3.4 billion. Revenues from interest rate positions increased by $60 million to $1.6 billion, while revenues from foreign exchange positions increased by $132 million to $1.3 billion. Revenues from equity activities increased by $83 million to $490 million.
But the report also noted that total credit exposure, which consists of both the netted current mark-to-market exposure, as well as potential future exposure, increased by $79.6 billion to $525 billion. "The big decline ininterest rates during the quarter caused a pretty sharp increase in credit exposures," Brosnan said. "We expected this. Almost 60% of the notional volumes outstanding are swaps, and the lion's share of that is for interest rates. When rates fall, contracts where the bank receives a fixedrate go up in value and that gives higher credit exposures."
Brosnan added that credit quality of derivatives exposures is holding up well - given the economic climate and well-publicised corporate bankruptcies.
During the second quarter, the notional amount of interest rate contracts increased by $3.4 trillion, to $42.7 trillion. Foreign exchange contracts increased by $183 million, to $5.8 trillion. This figure excludes spotforeign exchange contracts, which increased by $332 billion, to $504 billion. Equity, commodity and other contracts increased by $85 billion, to $1.1 trillion. Credit derivatives increased by $54 billion, to $492billion.
Paul Lyon
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion