Cad 3 will hit asset manager profits, says Mercer Oliver Wyman
The European Union’s proposed third capital adequacy directive (Cad 3) will force European asset managers to hold significantly more capital than at current levels. This will reduce their profitability, and could prompt a shake-out in the industry, according to new research by consultants Mercer Oliver Wyman.
“We estimate that the average asset manager not deemed to be exempt would have to hold back around 10% of profits over the next three years to build up the minimum capital requirements,” said Mercer Oliver Wyman. This means banks with asset management subsidiaries will take an implied return-on-equity hit that might make them “reassess the attractiveness of the business”, the company said.
The consultancy also believes some asset managers may try to relocate outside of the EU.
But Mercer Oliver Wyman takes a bullish view of the situation, saying non-exempt asset managers that upgrade their risk management procedures in line with the EU directive could promote their strong risk disciplines as an area of competitive advantage over their peers.
Cad 3, which largely draws on the new capital adequacy framework, Basel II, being drafted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, is set for implementation by the end of 2006.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness
Why UPIs could spell goodbye for OTC-Isins
Critics warn UK will miss opportunity to simplify transaction reporting if it spurns UPI
EC’s closing auction plan faces cool reception from markets
Participants say proposal for multiple EU equity closing auctions would split price formation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint
Hopes rise for EU re-entry to UK swaps market
EC says discussions on draft decision softening derivatives trading obligation are ‘advanced’
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans