Op risk assessment hampered by lack of reliable data
Inadequacy of loss expectation data is a major cause of modelling risk for operational risk strategies, said Carol Alexander, professor of the ISMA Centre at the University of Reading in the UK, at Risk’s annual European conference.
While Basel II calls for the assessment of operational risk, the process involves the quantitative modelling of it. One such approach is the loss model approach, which requires data on the frequency and severity distributions of data on losses resulting from operational risk, which is both hard to find and often skewed, she said.
There are two major sources of data for users of a loss model approach, public and consortium data, neither of which is reliable, said Alexander. Public data, mainly sourced from newspapers, is biased, she said. “This data is usually based on newsworthy events” such as the Enron and Tyco scandals, she said. “This data is not useful for quantitative assessment” because it is skewed towards severe events that seldom occur, said Alexander.
Meanwhile, consortium data, from regional operational risk groups or banks, focuses mainly on very general or “central” data that needs to be scaled to the size of an organisation. Yet, scaling brings another set of problems, she said. “When the data is sized for scale, you do not get enough information on the tails,” which includes information on less common events, she said. The solution is to integrate both the consortium and public data sets to compute the tails and get a complete picture of estimated loss data, she said.
However, there is debate about how the consortium and public data should be combined. While traditionally a classical method has been used – and this is what most operational risk software systems use – Alexander recommends a Bayesian model, which is "specifically designed to handle different data sets”, she said.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure
Industry warns CFTC against rushing to regulate AI for trading
Vote on workplan pulled amid calls to avoid duplicating rules from other regulatory agencies