Audit finds OTS helped banks cook their books
The US Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), the financial regulator responsible for overseeing mortgage lenders such as Washington Mutual and IndyMac, helped several institutions break accounting rules by backdating capital contributions last year to avoid them having to admit they were undercapitalised.
An audit report by the US Treasury's Office of the Inspector General, released on May 21, cited six examples of lenders receiving capital after the end of a reporting period, and then backdating the capital injection to make it appear they were adequately capitalised.
The only firm named was IndyMac, the Californian mortgage lender taken over by regulators in July last year. While it was preparing its quarterly report for the first quarter ending on March 31, 2008 - a report that would have shown it to be under the OTS's minimum 10% risk-based capital ratio - it received a $50 million capital infusion from its holding company, intended for the second quarter.
On May 9, 2008, IndyMac's chief executive Michael Perry asked the OTS's western region director, Darrel Dochow, whether $18 million of the capital could be backdated - reported as though it had been received before the end of March - to make the bank appear well-capitalised for the first quarter.
Both Dochow and a representative of IndyMac's auditor, Ernst & Young, agreed to allow the backdating, which breaks US generally accepted accounting principles. Ernst & Young officials told the inspector-general they were unfamiliar with the rules on capital backdating, and based their approval solely on the OTS's say-so.
The OTS's deputy director of examinations and supervision, Timothy Hill, told the investigators he was informed backdating was legal, as the capital had arrived in the form of a capital note before the end of March, even though the cash had not been infused until May. This, however, was not the case - the capital had only arrived in May, and no such note ever existed, Hill found after checking records in October.
The backdating did not help IndyMac for long - it received an OTS 'Camels' (capital adequacy, asset quality, management, earnings, liquidity and sensitivity to market risk) financial strength rating of 5 (the worst rating) after a comprehensive examination in June, and was in receivership by July 11.
At least five other institutions in the US have backdated capital in the same way - the report did not name them, as all are still trading.
In one case, OTS senior deputy director Scott Polakoff agreed to accept a south-eastern lender's backdating in August 2008 on the grounds capital had been received - again, in note form - before quarter-end on June 30, even though he was told no capital note or other evidence existed. The lender in question had already been warned privately by the OTS in a memorandum, described as an "informal enforcement action to correct unsafe and unsound practices or compliance issues", to raise its capital ratio above 15% rather than the normal 10%. It is now on the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's Problem Banks List, and also has a Camels rating of 5.
Polakoff, also the acting director of the OTS, is now on administrative leave.
In another case, the institution told the OTS in advance it planned to create a note in July 2008 and backdate it to June, to make it appear that it was well-capitalised at the end of June. The OTS agreed after the institution's chief financial officer warned that, without OTS approval of its capital levels, it would lose access to the broker deposit market and could collapse.
The OTS argued the institutions in question had all ultimately received the cash before filing their reports with the SEC, albeit after the end of the period to which the reports supposedly referred. The inspector-general replied this was irrelevant.
See also: Merge SEC and CFTC, says former SEC commissioner
FDIC: 252 US banks now at risk
Regulators shut down IndyMac
US mortgage lender closes doors after capital warning
Vision on
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure