Senators move to establish stronger federal oversight of energy markets
A group of US senators yesterday introduced legislation, called the Energy Market Oversight Act, that seeks to restore the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) authority over online and bilateral energy trades and give the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Ferc) powers to investigate and punish possible instances of fraud and manipulation in the over-the-counter energy markets.
The act is, in effect, a resurrection of last year’s Feinstein-led proposals to impose tighter control of the OTC markets in the wake of Enron’s collpase and the California power crisis. Her proposals were defeated in a routine procedural vote in April 2002 that required 60 affirmative senate votes for her legislation to advance.
“The legislation would close a loophole that allows energy trades to take place online with no transparency, no record keeping and no audit trail – with no federal oversight to guard against fraud and manipulation,” Feinstein said.
In 2000, Congress passed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which essentially exempted online and bilateral energy and metals trading from regulatory oversight. This loophole, the senators argue, allowed energy companies – such as EnronOnline – to trade billions of dollars worth of energy derivatives with no regulatory oversight. Their proposed legislation would increase notice, reporting, bookkeeping and other transparency requirements, and require energy companies to maintain sufficient capital to cover trades commensurate with risks.
The bill also seeks to prohibit 'wash trades', a practice that gained notoriety last year as a number of firms were found to be trading the same asset at the same price to boost trading volume figures. If the legislation passes, wash trades would be subject to civil penalties for each violation, and those found guilty could be imprisoned for up to 10 years. In December 2002, a former El Paso natural gas trader was indicted for reporting fictitious natural gas transactions to an industry publication, and Dynegy, Duke, El Paso, Reliant, CMS, and Williams have all admitted to engaging in wash trades.
The legislation also seeks to authorise Ferc to fine companies that do not comply with requests for information. This is the same authority that the Securities Exchange Commission has over financial institutions.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion
Iosco chief sees no need for CCPs to hold more capital
CCPs have shown resilience in volatile times without extra skin-in-the-game, says Buenaventura
Banks urge EBA to delay risk benchmarking amid Iran conflict
Risk managers say hypothetical portfolio exercise clashes with severe market turbulence