Investors hope end in sight for Canadian ABCP restructuring
Retail investors in distressed Canadian non-bank asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) expect to find out in the next two weeks whether further delays are expected to a restructuring plan.
The scheme, applicable under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), was devised by JP Morgan (Risk, May 2008, pages 28-30).
To succeed, the proposal needed the backing of investors holding at least two-thirds of the notional value of the paper and two-thirds of the total number of noteholders, with each vote counted equal.
On April 25, 96% of investors decided to back the plan, including a compromise deal that would involve the repurchase of the restructured notes at par for more than 2,500 retail investors holding less than C$1 million of affected paper.
Canaccord Capital, one of the brokerages that sold ABCP to retail clients, committed to repaying them in full between seven and 10 days after the completion of the restructuring. Another firm, Credential Securities, said it would pay its own retail clients within 20 days after the restructuring was in place.
Nevertheless, delays to the plan occurred when a group of disgruntled corporate investors (holding ABCP in excess of $1 million) who also wanted immediate repayment took their case to the courts.
A swift end to the saga was expected after the Supreme Court of Canada - the highest court in the country - declined to hear their case on September 19. Completion of the restructuring was set for the end of October, paving the way for retail investors to get their money back.
However, on October 20, the investors' committee announced a delay to the restructuring. "The completion of the transaction has taken longer than expected because of the large number of participants, the complexity of the documentation involved in the process and the recent volatility of the global financial markets," said the committee.
On October 29, the Ontario Court of Justice granted the committee an extension to complete the plan by November 28.
When contacted by Risk as to the possibility of further delays, Purdy Crawford, chairman of the investors' committee, said: "There has been no change since our press release of October 20 as to the timing for the completion of the restructuring."
Meanwhile, Mark Maybank, president and chief operating officer of Canaccord Capital, told Risk: "From our perspective, we remain confident in the current timeline".
According to the Investment Industry Regulatory Organisation of Canada (IIROC), which supervises investment dealers, seven dealers have already compensated 610 retail clients to the tune of C$319.7 million.
But 1,776 retail investors, who are collectively owed C$177.4 million - representing their full investment and interest owed - are still awaiting payment. And, understandably given the numerous delays to the process, many are concerned the investor's committee will seek a further extension to the restructuring.
Brian Hunter, a Calgary-based investor who bought C$658,000 of ABCP from Canaccord, is doubtful November will see a resolution. "Endless delays seem to be the strategy of those banks that don't want to crystallise losses on their books," he says. "It is possible those parties will seek a further delay around the 20th of November, which may push the process to Christmas at the earliest. If that happens, there is a 50/50 chance the restructuring might yet collapse."
See also: Canadian ABCP restructuring overcomes investor opposition
Power to the people
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
One thing missing from US Basel III proposal: a deadline
Without a deadline, risk teams will struggle to secure resources to begin implementation projects
In simplifying credit risk models, EBA could compound capital costs
Skipping hard yards of internal ratings-based approach might trip higher capital charges and implementation costs
Change fatigue could dim EBA’s credit risk simplicity drive
Revisions may be kept to a minimum as short-term implementation burden weighs on banks
Foreign banks can swerve US Basel op risk capital charges
New proposal offers category III and IV banks op-out from regime, but intragroup trades penalised
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules
DRW chief slams ‘ridiculous’ OCC stablecoin rule
Isda AGM: Wilson warns week-long redemption freeze would deter use of Genius Act coins as cash leg of tokenised repo
Dealers push for more revisions to Basel III endgame
Isda AGM: Goldman, JP Morgan bankers want changes on cross-product netting, CVA and default risk charges
StanChart: UK, EU should copy US ‘commercial’ Basel III
Isda AGM: Exec warns divergent Basel III rules will push trading into less-regulated entities