Copper scandal prompts SRB to ban trading
China is to ban units within its State Reserves Bureau (SRB) from trading in equity, foreign exchange, corporate bonds and derivatives, according to newswire reports in Beijing.
Liu officially worked for the separate State Regulation Centre for Supplies Reserve, but it later became apparent that he was in fact trading on behalf of the SRB. He has not been seen since the scandal broke, and the SRB says it is unsure of Liu’s whereabouts.
A deadline to settle the position passed on December 21, and metals analysts believe the bureau was allowed to roll forward most of the deliveries over the next three years. It had been hoping that prices would fall, but prices have soared after traders became dubious of SRB announcements that it had huge stockpiles to release into the markets.
Robin Bhat, a metals analyst at UBS in London, said the decision to put off payment could further backfire for the Chinese. “They have rolled forward presumably in the belief that the price would fall,” he said. “But it’s another bet that they’ve made and it could deal them a serious blow. We seem to be delaying the day of reckoning.”
The price of copper has continued to climb since then, and reached a record high of $4,615 per ton earlier this month on the London Metals Exchange – some $700 above trading when the scandal broke, adding to the cost of settling the position.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
One thing missing from US Basel III proposal: a deadline
Without a deadline, risk teams will struggle to secure resources to begin implementation projects
In simplifying credit risk models, EBA could compound capital costs
Skipping hard yards of internal ratings-based approach might trip higher capital charges and implementation costs
Change fatigue could dim EBA’s credit risk simplicity drive
Revisions may be kept to a minimum as short-term implementation burden weighs on banks
Foreign banks can swerve US Basel op risk capital charges
New proposal offers category III and IV banks op-out from regime, but intragroup trades penalised
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules
DRW chief slams ‘ridiculous’ OCC stablecoin rule
Isda AGM: Wilson warns week-long redemption freeze would deter use of Genius Act coins as cash leg of tokenised repo
Dealers push for more revisions to Basel III endgame
Isda AGM: Goldman, JP Morgan bankers want changes on cross-product netting, CVA and default risk charges
StanChart: UK, EU should copy US ‘commercial’ Basel III
Isda AGM: Exec warns divergent Basel III rules will push trading into less-regulated entities