Copper scandal prompts SRB to ban trading
China is to ban units within its State Reserves Bureau (SRB) from trading in equity, foreign exchange, corporate bonds and derivatives, according to newswire reports in Beijing.
Liu officially worked for the separate State Regulation Centre for Supplies Reserve, but it later became apparent that he was in fact trading on behalf of the SRB. He has not been seen since the scandal broke, and the SRB says it is unsure of Liu’s whereabouts.
A deadline to settle the position passed on December 21, and metals analysts believe the bureau was allowed to roll forward most of the deliveries over the next three years. It had been hoping that prices would fall, but prices have soared after traders became dubious of SRB announcements that it had huge stockpiles to release into the markets.
Robin Bhat, a metals analyst at UBS in London, said the decision to put off payment could further backfire for the Chinese. “They have rolled forward presumably in the belief that the price would fall,” he said. “But it’s another bet that they’ve made and it could deal them a serious blow. We seem to be delaying the day of reckoning.”
The price of copper has continued to climb since then, and reached a record high of $4,615 per ton earlier this month on the London Metals Exchange – some $700 above trading when the scandal broke, adding to the cost of settling the position.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Risk, portfolio margin, regulation: regtech to the rescue
A white paper outlining the complexity of setting the course for risk, margin and regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
Most read
- Industry urges focus on initial margin instead of intraday VM
- For a growing number of banks, synthetics are the real deal
- Did Fed’s stress capital buffer blunt CCAR?