Ferc unable to regulate OTC derivatives, admits own official
Charles Whitmore, special assistant in the office of market oversight at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Ferc), told an EPRM enterprise-wide risk management conference in Houston, Texas, yesterday, that he did not think the Ferc was capable of regulating energy derivatives – nor was the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), he added.
He added: “Expecting the Ferc to oversee regulating [OTC] derivatives trading is just crazy. And I’m sad to say that, because in the long term it is going to be the industry’s biggest issue, and the Ferc should be involved.”
The source added that the Ferc was fundamentally a paper factory, which goes against its real job of monitoring markets. “It’s about knowing the neighborhood. The Ferc is a police unit that’s supposed to police a Hispanic neighborhood – without a single Hispanic cop on the force.”
Energy derivatives have been exempt from regulation since Congress passed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act in 2000. But democratic senator Dianne Feinstein is trying to push a bill through Congress that would put energy derivatives firmly in the Ferc and the CFTC’s control.
Feinstein’s bill would make over-the-counter energy derivatives trades comply with reporting, record keeping, registration and capital reserve requirements similar to those that apply to regulated exchanges. The bill was defeated in February this year, but as new details of Enron’s behaviour and market abuse are released, the bill has found a second wind.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Basel III endgame: overall relief hides winners and losers
G-Sibs gain from surcharge reform while AOCI hits regional banks
One thing missing from US Basel III proposal: a deadline
Without a deadline, risk teams will struggle to secure resources to begin implementation projects
In simplifying credit risk models, EBA could compound capital costs
Skipping hard yards of internal ratings-based approach might trip higher capital charges and implementation costs
Change fatigue could dim EBA’s credit risk simplicity drive
Revisions may be kept to a minimum as short-term implementation burden weighs on banks
Foreign banks can swerve US Basel op risk capital charges
New proposal offers category III and IV banks op-out from regime, but intragroup trades penalised
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules
DRW chief slams ‘ridiculous’ OCC stablecoin rule
Isda AGM: Wilson warns week-long redemption freeze would deter use of Genius Act coins as cash leg of tokenised repo
Dealers push for more revisions to Basel III endgame
Isda AGM: Goldman, JP Morgan bankers want changes on cross-product netting, CVA and default risk charges