Ferc unable to regulate OTC derivatives, admits own official
Charles Whitmore, special assistant in the office of market oversight at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Ferc), told an EPRM enterprise-wide risk management conference in Houston, Texas, yesterday, that he did not think the Ferc was capable of regulating energy derivatives – nor was the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), he added.
He added: “Expecting the Ferc to oversee regulating [OTC] derivatives trading is just crazy. And I’m sad to say that, because in the long term it is going to be the industry’s biggest issue, and the Ferc should be involved.”
The source added that the Ferc was fundamentally a paper factory, which goes against its real job of monitoring markets. “It’s about knowing the neighborhood. The Ferc is a police unit that’s supposed to police a Hispanic neighborhood – without a single Hispanic cop on the force.”
Energy derivatives have been exempt from regulation since Congress passed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act in 2000. But democratic senator Dianne Feinstein is trying to push a bill through Congress that would put energy derivatives firmly in the Ferc and the CFTC’s control.
Feinstein’s bill would make over-the-counter energy derivatives trades comply with reporting, record keeping, registration and capital reserve requirements similar to those that apply to regulated exchanges. The bill was defeated in February this year, but as new details of Enron’s behaviour and market abuse are released, the bill has found a second wind.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness