Ferc unable to regulate OTC derivatives, admits own official
Charles Whitmore, special assistant in the office of market oversight at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Ferc), told an EPRM enterprise-wide risk management conference in Houston, Texas, yesterday, that he did not think the Ferc was capable of regulating energy derivatives – nor was the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), he added.
He added: “Expecting the Ferc to oversee regulating [OTC] derivatives trading is just crazy. And I’m sad to say that, because in the long term it is going to be the industry’s biggest issue, and the Ferc should be involved.”
The source added that the Ferc was fundamentally a paper factory, which goes against its real job of monitoring markets. “It’s about knowing the neighborhood. The Ferc is a police unit that’s supposed to police a Hispanic neighborhood – without a single Hispanic cop on the force.”
Energy derivatives have been exempt from regulation since Congress passed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act in 2000. But democratic senator Dianne Feinstein is trying to push a bill through Congress that would put energy derivatives firmly in the Ferc and the CFTC’s control.
Feinstein’s bill would make over-the-counter energy derivatives trades comply with reporting, record keeping, registration and capital reserve requirements similar to those that apply to regulated exchanges. The bill was defeated in February this year, but as new details of Enron’s behaviour and market abuse are released, the bill has found a second wind.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management