Welcome to the first issue of Life & Pensions
The life and pensions industry is reinventing itself. The old days when the business of long-term saving was driven by marketing, and liabilities didn't count, are gone forever. The now-notorious combination of low inflation, falling equity returns and increasing longevity over the past five years has shown the cost of risk management failure.
Providers have responded to this, using capital market solutions to repair and optimise their balance sheets, and changing their offerings from a marketing-driven to a capital-driven product mix. Regulators have also responded, attempting to restore confidence by moving towards realistic capital requirements. Sometimes the regulators are a step ahead of the industry they supervise, sometimes several steps behind.
The variation in skill and experience is enormous. On one extreme are the emerging tribe of chief risk officers at multinational life companies whose risk and capital modelling skills are arguably equal or superior to that of leading investment banks. At the other extreme are the part-time trustees of defined benefit pension schemes, many of whom are only beginning to appreciate their risk management responsibilities.
While the intellectual arguments are on the side of realistic, economic value approaches, one can partially sympathise with opposing views. Far more than banking, life and pensions provision in Europe is rooted in the social identity of nation states. Rapid change can be destabilising, such as forcing UK pension schemes to sell equities or German life companies to mark to market. Breaking the log jam are governments which realise that generous state retirement guarantees - made either explicitly or by default - are demographically and fiscally unsustainable.
Addressing these problems will require both analysis and argument, and will take time. There will have to be a breaking-down of historical barriers, not only between life and pensions practitioners, but also the silos between actuarial, insurance, quantitative finance, banking and investment knowledge. Even when solutions are found, they are seldom straightforward because they have to be implemented within far-from-perfect regulatory, accounting and taxation frameworks.
In this confusing and fast-changing world, the industry needs an international forum to share experiences, discuss the issues and learn about the new business environment. In the same way that our sister publication, Risk, fostered the development of over-the-counter derivatives markets and bank risk management, now enshrined by regulators in Basel II, we hope that Life & Pensions will perform a similar service for the life and pensions industry.
In the magazine you will find news on important regulatory, industry and intellectual developments. In our feature articles, there will be in-depth analysis of key issues such as capital models or supervisory frameworks, and of financial market or technology solutions. Where possible we will base much of our analysis of these solutions on the experience of life and pensions practitioners as well as vendors. Every month we will profile specific practitioners from across Europe.
At the back of the magazine you will find one or more peer-reviewed technical articles, as well as educational articles. Here, our aim is to create a body of knowledge and best practice that can become a recognised industry resource. To achieve its aims, Life & Pensions needs your support. We invite submissions of technical papers (see page 19 for submission guidelines), and we ask that experts make themselves available as anonymous referees. We invite suggestions and feedback on all aspects of the magazine, and look forward to serving our readership.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure
Industry warns CFTC against rushing to regulate AI for trading
Vote on workplan pulled amid calls to avoid duplicating rules from other regulatory agencies
Bank of Communications moves early to meet TLAC requirements
China Construction Bank becomes last China G-Sib to release TLAC plans
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
- Top 10 op risks: third parties stoke cyber risk