Chairman of the Fed says Basel II needs to go to the next stages of implementation
Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke, has emphasised the Fed’s support for Basel II, and urged that congress, bank regulators and the industry work together to progress to the next phase of implementation. Bernanke emphasised his belief that Basel II was vital to modernise banking supervision and best industry practice, and promised that with effective regulation, substantial benefits for the industry will follow.
In his speech to the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago’s annual conference on bank structure and competition, however, Bernanke spent most of his time assuaging various industry concerns.
Bernanke stressed no fewer than eight times in his speech that the revised Accord will only apply to the largest, most complex and most internationally active banks, but conceded that even these institutions are concerned that the cost of implementing Basel II will outweigh the benefits. Further, US banks have expressed displeasure over the complexity of the upcoming Proposed Notice of Rulemaking (NPR). Bernanke argued that modern risk management is itself complicated, and that sound risk management under the revised Accord will eventually pay for itself.
Other concerns that the industry has expressed include unfair advantages to banks implementing Basel II over those still operating under Basel I. Bernanke assured the audience that changes made to update Basel I will mitigate any such inequities, but he urged firms to submit specific advice if the provisions to Basel Ia are inadequate.
The chairman admitted that the Fed cannot say precisely how much Basel II, when fully implemented, will affect a bank’s risk capital requirements in comparison with Basel I. Referring to the flawed fourth quantitative impact study (QIS4), Bernanke stated that some of the studies have been conducted using banks that would generally not be implementing Basel II anyway, which in turn produced imperfect results. Bernanke stated that as the Basel II implementation process moved forward, the regulators will be able to provide more accurate information.
Bernanke warned that despite these concerns, the system needed to modernise. “Waiting for a crisis to force change would be foolish; by moving forward now, we have the luxury of being deliberate in the development and introduction of a system that produces benefits,” he said.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma denies need for new competitiveness mandate
MEP wants explicit requirement; Esma official says it’s already covered in existing rulebook
US regulators cut FRTB’s IMA capital hit by 59%, Isda finds
Trade body pushes for further changes to cross-product netting, default risk charge
US FRTB glitch could spit out negative capital charges
Effort to recognise risk diversification between IMA and standardised approach went too far
Euronext, LCH back Esma as exchange super-regulator
National oversight hurts Europe, exchange officials say – but some are not ready to accept a single watchdog
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive