GAO urges curbs on 'tying'
The General Accounting Office has recommended that bank regulators take additional measures to adequately enforce laws against the tying of commercial credit to more lucrative investment banking business, despite a lack of hard evidence to support accusations that the practice may be widespread.
House Financial Services Committee chairman Michael Oxley, says: “The GAO found little evidence of widespread tying practices at commercial banks with their investment banking affiliates, but the study underscores the importance of continued vigilance.”
According to the GAO report, regulators have so far focused their enquiries on interviews with the banks and transaction-specific reviews, and have failed to include more broad-based transaction testing and interviews with corporate borrowers.
The GAO recommends that “banking regulators may have to obtain other forms of indirect evidence to assess whether banks unlawfully tie products and services.”
The report also shows that many corporate borrowers are confused by the anti-tying regulations, and that banks’ interpretations of the law and its exceptions can occasionally contain substantial variations. And although the Federal Reserve recently issued a new draft interpretation for public comment, the GAO has suggested that additional guidance on the laws is needed.
Congressman Dingell, the report’s sponsor, agrees. In a letter to the Fed’s Alan Greenspan, he wrote: “The interpretation is overly complex...and I continue to see many pitfalls for the wary and unwary alike…The tone of the document appears to be tilted toward a ‘wink and nod’ approach to non-compliance.”US Credit
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules
DRW chief slams ‘ridiculous’ OCC stablecoin rule
Isda AGM: Wilson warns week-long redemption freeze would deter use of Genius Act coins as cash leg of tokenised repo
Dealers push for more revisions to Basel III endgame
Isda AGM: Goldman, JP Morgan bankers want changes on cross-product netting, CVA and default risk charges
StanChart: UK, EU should copy US ‘commercial’ Basel III
Isda AGM: Exec warns divergent Basel III rules will push trading into less-regulated entities
NBFI oversight ‘no longer adequate’, say BdF economists
Researchers call for stronger supervision of non-bank sector ‘before risks actually materialise’
Why Brexit still stirs up trouble for cross-border business
As EU erects another obstacle, banks consider ways around it – or exit strategies
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities