EU markets are at a historic high, says EU commissioner
The EU is ahead of the US with many financial products.
European Union (EU) financial services markets are in their best shape ever, according to Commissioner for the Internal Market Charlie McCreevy. Speaking at the annual Association of Corporate Treasurers dinner, he praised the increasing competitiveness and openness of the system and urged industry to push further in order to make the European sphere the world’s leader and standard-bearer.
Specifically, McCreevy focused on Europe’s progress compared with that of the US. He said: “Comparing EU financial markets today [with] those of our main competitor, the US, European markets are clearly leading in the areas of commercial banking, forex, OTC derivatives, insurance, reinsurance and foreign equity trading.” McCreevy urged against complacency in the pursuit of the Commission’s goals, even if this may well mean yet more regulation.
He also praised industry for its full co-operation in legislation consultation processes, highlighting the across-the-board agreement on the content of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid) as an example. McCreevy views it as a “balanced, proportionate and sensible set of measures [that] will enhance competitiveness”.
In utilising the strength of the EU’s collective decision making, McCreevy hopes that others will follow Europe’s lead. Processes of harmonisation and openness should be developed internationally in his view, and the EU should maintain its lead in setting the principles for others to follow.
Even in this wider context though, he still believes that in EU terms, “while much has been done, there is still much more to do.”
McCreevy was speaking at the Association of Corporate Treasurers’ annual dinner.
BaselAlert.comOnly users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion