US regulators issue Basel I improvement ANPR
US federal banking agencies have issued for public comment proposed changes to that country’s domestic risk-based capital framework. The advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) will apply to banks, bank holding companies and savings associations.
The ANPR document discusses various modifications to the US risk-based capital standards, including increasing the number of risk weight categories to which credit exposures may be assigned; expanding the use of external credit ratings as an indicator of credit risk for externally rated exposures; and expanding the range of collateral and guarantors that may qualify an exposure for lower risk weights.
The proposals also discuss the use of loan-to-value ratios, credit assessments, and other broad measures of credit risk for assigning risk-weights to residential mortgages; modifying the credit conversion factor for various commitments, including those with an original maturity of under one year; and requiring that certain loans 90 days or more past due or in a non-accrual status be assigned to a higher risk weight category.
Other topics discussed in the ANPR are: the modification of the risk-based capital requirements for certain commercial real estate exposures; increasing the risk sensitivity of capital requirements for other types of retail, multifamily, small business and commercial exposures; and assessing a risk-based capital charge to reflect the risks in securitisations with early amortisation provisions that are backed by revolving retail exposures.
The agencies will accept public comment on or before January 18, 2006.
The ANPR can be accessed at:
http://www.federalreserve.gov/BoardDocs/Press/bcreg/2005/20051020/
attachment.pdf
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hopes rise for EU re-entry to UK swaps market
EC says discussions on draft decision softening derivatives trading obligation are ‘advanced’
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns