
Profile: A business that's here to stay
Special report: Focus on the USA

As Structured Products went to press the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) was embroiled in one of its all too frequent scandals. Several former NYSE traders, who oversaw stock auctions on the exchange floor face indictment on charges that they traded to benefit their specialist firms at the expense of customers. And the US Securities and Exchange Commission is expected to file and settle charges against the NYSE, claiming the exchange did not properly police floor traders.
The news comes at a bad time for the exchange, the bastion of American capitalism. The NYSE reported net income of $24.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to $49.6 million in 2003, and memories of Richard Grasso's $187.5 million pay package are still fresh in the mind. Grasso's replacement, NYSE chief executive John Thain, is now faced with expanding the exchange quickly enough to meet the demands of a rapidly changing global stock market as well as updating the exchange's technology and maintaining the NYSE's position. Some are suggesting that the institution should go public, and rumours are circulating that even if it doesn't, big changes are on the horizon.
Success
Susan Waiter, NYSE's managing director of structured products in the investment banking services group, refuses to be drawn on what the future may hold for the exchange, but appears comfortable in the knowledge that her department is enjoying considerable success. Waiter, who joined the NYSE in 2003, points out that while there were hardly any structured products available when the exchange launched the business in 1988, there are now 600 products available at any one time, and around 1,100 products have been launched in total. These products have a market valuation in excess of $125 billion, and the exchange claims it commanded a 94% share of all listed US structured products offerings in 2003.
Unlike the American Stock Exchange (Amex), the NYSE specialises in corporate issues. But like the NYSE, Amex has also noted an upswing in structured products activity, with listings there growing from 11 in 1995, 1996, and 1997, to 115 in 2004.
Last month, like many other US structured investment specialists, Waiter attended the Structured Products Association's annual conference in New York. Waiter notes that the association is a welcome development, useful for "strengthening relationships between issuers and attorneys". The conference also provided a forum for debating innovations in the growing US market, and while Waiter refuses to say which areas she thinks the NYSE might develop, she does say that clients of the exchange can expect some interesting launches in the near future.
And the NYSE, as well as Amex, is eagerly awaiting news of generic standards for exchange-listed structured products provided by the SEC. If approved, the development will mean the time to market for listed products could be significantly reduced for those whose features have already been listed. At the moment, each product has to be registered separately with the SEC, even if it is a carbon copy of a previous product.
Regulatory changes would certainly be helpful, but educating brokers about the advantages of structured products is even more important if the market is to grow further, Waiter says.
One obvious move for the NYSE would be to offer some form of equity derivatives business. The exchange lost out in this area, mostly to the benefit of Chicago, but many observers say the NYSE would do well to consider derivatives in its attempt to modernise. And while Waiter agrees that they would be a good fit with the existing structured products business, she again refuses to elaborate.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
SEC may lack legal clout to impose new dealer rule – Citadel
Adoption of quantitative dealer definition may require congressional changes to US Securities Exchange Act
US Basel endgame hits clearing with op risk capital charges
Dealers also fret about unlevel playing field compared with requirements in the EU
CFTC’s clearing house recovery rule splits industry
Some fear CCPs will fast-track recovery, others say any rule book will be ignored in emergency
EU banks ‘will play for time’ in stand-off over India’s CCPs
Lawyers say banks are unlikely to set up subsidiaries and will instead pin hopes on revised Emir fix
ECB mulls intervention on uneven banking book reporting
Inconsistency among EU banks on whether deposits and loans are in scope for credit spread risk
Iosco warns of leveraged loan ‘vulnerabilities’
As recovery rates plummet, report calls for clearer covenants and more transparency on addbacks
Narrow path to compromise on EU’s post-Brexit clearing rules
Lawmakers unlikely to support industry demand to delete Emir active accounts proposal altogether
The Fed’s stress test models are inaccurate. Something has to change
First step for US regulator to improve its bank loss forecasts would be to open up its models to public scrutiny, argue two banking industry advocates