Exelon proposes NRG merger
Exelon Corporation has announced details of a $6.2bn proposal to acquire NRG Energy, a merger that would create the largest US power company in terms of assets, market capitalisation, enterprise value and generating capacity.
Exelon’s unsolicited proposal has offered to acquire all outstanding NRG common stock. The all-stock transaction will have a fixed exchange ratio of 0.485 Exelon shares for each NRG share. This equates to a value of $26.43 for each NRG common share, representing a total value of $6.2bn based on Exelon’s closing price of $54.40 on 17 October 2008. This is a 37% premium to the closing price for NRG shares on the same day, according to Exelon.
In a statement released yesterday, Exelon said the deal would allow NRG shareholders to exchange their stock for Exelon stock, providing “the opportunity to participate in the future growth of the largest and most diversified power company in the nation”.
Combined, the two companies would have a total enterprise value of approximately $60bn and a generating capacity of approximately 47,000 megawatts – “enough to serve nearly 45 million homes,” according to John Rowe, chairman and CEO of Exelon.
In a letter to David Crane, president and CEO of NRG, Rowe said the merger would “address critical national energy needs in a highly effective fashion” and create substantially more value for shareholders in both companies than either could generate alone.
He noted that board, shareholder and regulatory approvals would be required and that the latter may depend on “modest divesture” of some assets in certain markets. However, Exelon has created a divesture strategy to address any concerns regulatory authorities may have in this respect, according to Rowe.
NRG has confirmed receipt of the proposal and said its board of directors would review the details and respond appropriately “in due course”.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint
Hopes rise for EU re-entry to UK swaps market
EC says discussions on draft decision softening derivatives trading obligation are ‘advanced’
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions