JP Morgan, Citigroup pay $255 million in Enron, Dynegy settlement
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) today settled enforcement proceedings brought against JP Morgan Chase and Citigroup. Both firms’ settlements pertain to Enron-related proceedings brought by the SEC. Under the agreements, JP Morgan Chase will pay $135 million. Citigroup will pay $120 million; $19 million of this settlement is related to Citigroup’s business with Dynegy.
"We intend to continue to hold counterparties responsible for helping companies manipulate their reported results. Financial institutions in particular should know better than to enter into structured transactions where the structure is determined solely by accounting and reporting wishes of a public company," said Linda Chatman Thomsen, deputy director in the SEC's enforcement division.
In its statement, the SEC claimed “each institution helped Enron mislead its investors by characterising what were essentially loan proceeds as cash from operating activities. The proceeding against Citigroup also resolves [the SEC’s] charges stemming from the assistance Citigroup provided Dynegy in manipulating that company's financial statements through similar conduct”.
The main thrust of the SEC’s allegations were that JP Morgan Chase and Citigroup engaged in, and helped design, structured finance transactions that misled investors, analysts and rating agencies as to Enron and Dynegy’s true financial health.
In relation to JP Morgan Chase’s Enron-related activities, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the New York State Banking Department entered into a written agreement with JP Morgan Chase, whereby the US bank undertook to enhance its risk management programs and internal controls.
JP Morgan Chase and Citigroup will also pay a total of $27.5 million to the District Attorney’s office, $2.5 million of which is to reimburse the office’s expenses. Under this agreement, the District Attorney will not prosecute either of the US firms’ officers or employees.
In reaching the settlement, both JP Morgan Chase and Citigroup neither admitted, nor denied, the SEC’s allegations. William Harrison, JP Morgan Chase’s chairman and chief executive said his firm was “glad” to put a major portion of the “Enron matter” behind it.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos