JP Morgan, Citigroup pay $255 million in Enron, Dynegy settlement
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) today settled enforcement proceedings brought against JP Morgan Chase and Citigroup. Both firms’ settlements pertain to Enron-related proceedings brought by the SEC. Under the agreements, JP Morgan Chase will pay $135 million. Citigroup will pay $120 million; $19 million of this settlement is related to Citigroup’s business with Dynegy.
"We intend to continue to hold counterparties responsible for helping companies manipulate their reported results. Financial institutions in particular should know better than to enter into structured transactions where the structure is determined solely by accounting and reporting wishes of a public company," said Linda Chatman Thomsen, deputy director in the SEC's enforcement division.
In its statement, the SEC claimed “each institution helped Enron mislead its investors by characterising what were essentially loan proceeds as cash from operating activities. The proceeding against Citigroup also resolves [the SEC’s] charges stemming from the assistance Citigroup provided Dynegy in manipulating that company's financial statements through similar conduct”.
The main thrust of the SEC’s allegations were that JP Morgan Chase and Citigroup engaged in, and helped design, structured finance transactions that misled investors, analysts and rating agencies as to Enron and Dynegy’s true financial health.
In relation to JP Morgan Chase’s Enron-related activities, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the New York State Banking Department entered into a written agreement with JP Morgan Chase, whereby the US bank undertook to enhance its risk management programs and internal controls.
JP Morgan Chase and Citigroup will also pay a total of $27.5 million to the District Attorney’s office, $2.5 million of which is to reimburse the office’s expenses. Under this agreement, the District Attorney will not prosecute either of the US firms’ officers or employees.
In reaching the settlement, both JP Morgan Chase and Citigroup neither admitted, nor denied, the SEC’s allegations. William Harrison, JP Morgan Chase’s chairman and chief executive said his firm was “glad” to put a major portion of the “Enron matter” behind it.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance