JP Morgan, Citigroup pay $255 million in Enron, Dynegy settlement
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) today settled enforcement proceedings brought against JP Morgan Chase and Citigroup. Both firms’ settlements pertain to Enron-related proceedings brought by the SEC. Under the agreements, JP Morgan Chase will pay $135 million. Citigroup will pay $120 million; $19 million of this settlement is related to Citigroup’s business with Dynegy.
"We intend to continue to hold counterparties responsible for helping companies manipulate their reported results. Financial institutions in particular should know better than to enter into structured transactions where the structure is determined solely by accounting and reporting wishes of a public company," said Linda Chatman Thomsen, deputy director in the SEC's enforcement division.
In its statement, the SEC claimed “each institution helped Enron mislead its investors by characterising what were essentially loan proceeds as cash from operating activities. The proceeding against Citigroup also resolves [the SEC’s] charges stemming from the assistance Citigroup provided Dynegy in manipulating that company's financial statements through similar conduct”.
The main thrust of the SEC’s allegations were that JP Morgan Chase and Citigroup engaged in, and helped design, structured finance transactions that misled investors, analysts and rating agencies as to Enron and Dynegy’s true financial health.
In relation to JP Morgan Chase’s Enron-related activities, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the New York State Banking Department entered into a written agreement with JP Morgan Chase, whereby the US bank undertook to enhance its risk management programs and internal controls.
JP Morgan Chase and Citigroup will also pay a total of $27.5 million to the District Attorney’s office, $2.5 million of which is to reimburse the office’s expenses. Under this agreement, the District Attorney will not prosecute either of the US firms’ officers or employees.
In reaching the settlement, both JP Morgan Chase and Citigroup neither admitted, nor denied, the SEC’s allegations. William Harrison, JP Morgan Chase’s chairman and chief executive said his firm was “glad” to put a major portion of the “Enron matter” behind it.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Foreign banks can swerve US Basel op risk capital charges
New proposal offers category III and IV banks op-out from regime, but intragroup trades penalised
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules
DRW chief slams ‘ridiculous’ OCC stablecoin rule
Isda AGM: Wilson warns week-long redemption freeze would deter use of Genius Act coins as cash leg of tokenised repo
Dealers push for more revisions to Basel III endgame
Isda AGM: Goldman, JP Morgan bankers want changes on cross-product netting, CVA and default risk charges
StanChart: UK, EU should copy US ‘commercial’ Basel III
Isda AGM: Exec warns divergent Basel III rules will push trading into less-regulated entities
NBFI oversight ‘no longer adequate’, say BdF economists
Researchers call for stronger supervision of non-bank sector ‘before risks actually materialise’
Why Brexit still stirs up trouble for cross-border business
As EU erects another obstacle, banks consider ways around it – or exit strategies
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor