Basel to adopt flexible approach to point-in-time and business cycle ratings
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the architect of the Basel II capital Accord, will adopt a flexible approach to point-in-time and business cycle credit ratings used by banks when reviewing advanced internal-rating based approaches.
But, he added: “There are many fundamental questions that we are still thinking about." This includes some of the pros and cons of banks using longer-term ratings that cover full business cycles versus ratings calculated on a point-in-time basis. “These are questions that are, as yet, still unanswered.”
Darryll Hendricks, senior vice-president at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, said national regulators were likely to adopt a flexible approach to the use of both point-in-time and business cycle ratings with regard to advanced credit risk methodologies used in Basel II. But, speaking in a personal capacity, Hendricks added: “It is important for the industry itself that it understands and adjusts its own behaviour in advance. We have multiple options in the framework. I would like to narrow the range as much as we can.”.
But Adam Gilbert, chief operating officer of JP Morgan Chase’s credit product group, said regulator concerns about point-in-time ratings were overstated. “Our own models send us very powerful signals about what is happening to our risk processes. You don’t need a regulator to tell you your credit risk has changed,” Gilbert said.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack