Basel to adopt flexible approach to point-in-time and business cycle ratings
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the architect of the Basel II capital Accord, will adopt a flexible approach to point-in-time and business cycle credit ratings used by banks when reviewing advanced internal-rating based approaches.
But, he added: “There are many fundamental questions that we are still thinking about." This includes some of the pros and cons of banks using longer-term ratings that cover full business cycles versus ratings calculated on a point-in-time basis. “These are questions that are, as yet, still unanswered.”
Darryll Hendricks, senior vice-president at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, said national regulators were likely to adopt a flexible approach to the use of both point-in-time and business cycle ratings with regard to advanced credit risk methodologies used in Basel II. But, speaking in a personal capacity, Hendricks added: “It is important for the industry itself that it understands and adjusts its own behaviour in advance. We have multiple options in the framework. I would like to narrow the range as much as we can.”.
But Adam Gilbert, chief operating officer of JP Morgan Chase’s credit product group, said regulator concerns about point-in-time ratings were overstated. “Our own models send us very powerful signals about what is happening to our risk processes. You don’t need a regulator to tell you your credit risk has changed,” Gilbert said.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities