Private investigator Capcon focuses on UK banks
UK-based private investigation firm Capcon is making a push to win more business from banks and brokers worried by the operational and reputational risks of dealing with, or employing, people with 'skeletons in the closet'.
Started in 1983, the firm originally focused on the leisure and brewing industry, but has also worked for a number of brokers and banks in the interim. It hired ex-stockbroker Karine Luckraft earlier this year to spearhead its targeting of financial services firms. Luckraft’s first encounter with Capcon came in 1994, when the broker she was working for hired the private investigator for an initial public offering deal it was working on.
This type of investigation is popular among Capcon’s clients: “We were called in at the back-end of a flotation because someone in a corporate finance team smelt a rat in the soon-to-be-floated company’s management,” Luckraft said. The business had already been vetted by a top-four auditor and a top-five law firm, both of which said all was well.
But Capcon discovered that suspicions about one of the managers were well founded. “He was wanted for money-laundering in relation to two companies in the Benelux region and was high-up on Interpol’s most-wanted list,” Luckraft added.
Establishing relationships with law enforcement agencies such as Interpol – the organisation that promotes and facilitates international police co-operation - is made easier with ex-police officers on the staff, claimed Bob Dulieu, head of Capcon’s investigations division. Dulieu said Capcon also uses non-traditional sources of intelligence, but declined to elaborate. Prior to joining Capcon in 2000, he was an officer in London’s Metropolitan Police for 15 years.
Despite the lack of initial public offerings and mergers and acquisitions activity, Capcon has around 20 city-related deals in the pipeline, claimed Luckraft.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga