Bond Market Association warns Congress of catastrophe bond market disruption
Christopher McGhee, head of insurance risk-linked securities trading at insurance and reinsurance broker Marsh & McLennan Securities in New York, told a US House of Representatives financial services subcommittee yesterday that pending accounting changes in the US could dampen new issuance of insurance risk-linked securities, commonly referred to as catastrophe bonds.
He said that, as of last month, there were $2.7 billion catastrophe bonds outstanding, and added that since 1997, 45 catastrophe bond transactions have been completed, representing a total catastrophe risk transfer of $6 billion from insurance markets to capital markets.
A new proposed interpretation of an accounting rule by the US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) could require investors with the largest equity stake in new catastrophe bond issues to consolidate an entire issue on their balance sheets if the issue has a less than 10% total equity component.
A similar issue vexed the collateralised debt obligation market after charges of accounting fraud at Enron and other US corporations hastened new tougher treatments of special purpose entities, or SPEs – the legal structures through which financial risk transfer is often accomplished.
“Any FASB proposal that results in an increase in the third-party equity requirements for …[insurance risk-linked securities]…or requires consolidation of the SPEs on the balance sheet of any other entity involved in the transaction would be severely detrimental to the market,” McGhee told the Committee of Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.
One catastrophe bond investor said the market was aware of the issue, but though a burden would be imposed were the proposed revision to go through, a secondary trading market in the equity of catastrophe risk issues would likely develop in response.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack