Moody’s backtracks on bank ratings
Following criticism over the use of Joint Default Analysis (JDA) in calculating its bank ratings, New York-based Moody’s Investors Service will review the practice.
Chris Mahoney, chairman of Moody’s credit policy committee, said: “In our initial application of JDA to banks, some rating outcomes were heavily dependent on high external support assumptions.” He added those in the market desired ratings with “more emphasis on intrinsic credit fundamentals”.
A slew of controversy followed recent upgrades made to some bank ratings under JDA, most notably the re-rating of some Icelandic banks to Aaa. Fresh changes to the way in which Moody’s works out bank ratings and notches for bank issuance will be published by March 30. They will be applied to ratings that have been affected in North America, Central Europe and the Nordic, Benelux and Baltic states by April 10. Many of the banks whose ratings were upgraded are now likely to see them fall.
Moody’s will publish a revised schedule for JDA implementation elsewhere when the revised methodology is released. The agency expects to finish its programme of reviewing all bank ratings by May 18.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos
Long way round: EU banks lament credit spread saga
EBA ditches some of banks’ preferred qualitative reasonings – and shortcuts – for CSRBB exclusion
Iosco chief sees no need for CCPs to hold more capital
CCPs have shown resilience in volatile times without extra skin-in-the-game, says Buenaventura