SEC proposes relaxation of Sarbox for foreign firms
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of the US has proposed a relaxation of the Sarbanes-Oxley rules, allowing foreign companies listing on US exchanges an extra year to comply with the regulations.
Under the proposals, small and medium companies in the US and overseas firms will obtain a year's exemption from Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires companies to establish stringent internal controls and for these processes to be checked by auditors.
Christopher Cox, chairman of the SEC, said: “By offering further relief for smaller companies and most foreign issuers, today's actions will allow time for the Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to redesign Section 404 implementation in a way that is efficient and cost effective for investors.”
Sarbanes-Oxley, which was passed in 2002 in the wake of the Enron and WorldCom scandals, is designed to ensure that financial results published by companies are accurate. Critics of the legislation have blamed it for pushing international companies to list on exchanges in London or Hong Kong, rather than in the US.
John White, director of the SEC's division of corporation finance, told RiskNews: “This will allow companies to list in the US and then turn to the Sarbanes-Oxley process instead of doing both simultaneously. The extra year will make it much more attractive to list in the US.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Lifeline keeps Europe’s hopes afloat for single-sided reporting
Despite Esma’s proposal for delegated reporting of trades, the industry may yet get its wish
EU’s plan to get competitive faces big legislative hurdles
Large and controversial legislative package may be too amorphous to deliver results quickly
FDIC relearns SVB lessons in resolution tinkering
Paring back requirements gets thumbs up from some, but concerns linger
Stablecoin consortia may be ‘interim’ step to solo bank issuance
Former Citi payments head and Ubyx founder says all G-Sibs will issue their own coins
Report once: will Esma’s €1bn reforms deliver the full picture?
Critics say plan to merge three reporting regimes will see scant returns, and won’t mesh with single-sided reporting
CFTC accused of ‘double standards’ on compute futures
Duffy questions ‘long review’ of CME’s contract when Kalshi already offers similar product
Europe’s banks can’t agree on how to fix the output floor
Some want market risk excluded, while others push for greater savings from credit modelling
SEC gunning to take over Cat in 2027
Regulator's bid for control of market surveillance apparatus splits industry participants