Basel II op risk survey launched
Global banking regulators today launched their second survey seeking data on operational losses suffered by banks to help refine the op risk proposals of the Basel II capital Accord.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has invited banks to come up with their own ideas on sophisticated ways of measuring the operational risks they face. But lack of data on operational losses has held back progress on developing effective op risk models.
The Basel II Accord will require large international banks for the first time to set aside capital specifically to guard against the risk of loss from operational hazards such as fraud, technology failure and trade settlement errors. Regulators hope the accord will come into effect in late 2006.
The Basel Committee, which in effect regulates international banking, said the survey would collect information on various exposure indicators as well as operational losses. The data would be treated with complete confidentiality.
The Committee said it planned to provide feedback to the banking industry on the survey’s results. But it added this would be done without disclosing individual bank data.
The Basel regulators see the op risk survey as a data collection exercise and therefore launched it ahead of QIS3 – the key third Basel II quantitative impact study planned for October 1.
QIS3 will seek information from banks on the overall impact of Basel II. It will be used as a basis for the third consultative paper on Basel II that the Basel regulators hope to issue in May next year.
They then hope to issue their final version of Basel II by the end of 2003, allowing some three years for banks and national regulators to prepare for Basel II’s coming into effect.
(Details of the op risk survey – Operational Risk Data Collection Exercise 2002 – are available on the Bank for International Settlements’ website: www.bis.org)
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint
Hopes rise for EU re-entry to UK swaps market
EC says discussions on draft decision softening derivatives trading obligation are ‘advanced’
BoE’s Ramsden defends UK’s ring-fencing regime
Deputy governor also says regulatory reform is coming to the UK gilt repo market
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions