New double-counting methodology responsible for greater-than-expected rise in credit derivatives
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association’s mid-year survey of the over-the-counter derivatives market showed a substantial increase in credit derivatives notional volumes, growing from $918.9 billion at the end of 2001 to $1.6 trillion at mid-2002. But the figure this year was calculated according to a new adjustment rate to discount double counting, which eliminates trades between two counterparties being counted twice. This has put an excessively favourable sheen on the latest results, said Isda.
“Looking at the BIS survey, we drew the conclusion that the number of end-users were greater than the amount of dealers in the credit derivatives world. So, based on the BIS methodology, we raised our adjustment factor by 18%,” said Mengle. “Had we used the same adjustment factor for the previous survey, total credit derivative volumes would have been over $1 trillion at the end of last year,” he added.
According to Isda’s new methodology, credit derivatives volumes increased by 44% in the first six months of the year on a pro forma basis.
Interest rate and currency derivatives volumes also showed reasonable growth in the first half of the year, increasing by 19% to $82.7 trillion. Isda also surveyed the equity derivatives market for the first time. Total notional outstandings for equity derivatives stood at $2.3 trillion at mid-2002.
Isda’s mid-year derivatives survey is based on responses collated from around 80 of its member firms, including major derivatives houses, government entities and end-users.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Euronext, LCH back Esma as exchange super-regulator
National oversight hurts Europe, exchange officials say – but some are not ready to accept a single watchdog
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London