US minimum bank asset ratios suggested for larger banks
European banking supervisors might follow the example of US regulators and develop the concept of well-capitalised banks with higher minimum protective capital than required under the Basel bank capital adequacy Accord, according to some European regulators.
“The authorities might wish to consider setting higher early warning levels for these banks to enable action to be taken while they were still able to operate,” said the paper.
Banking authorities probably need to take into account the likelihood that reductions in the capital of a large bank could affect its access to financial markets, even when its capital exceeds the minimum by the 1988 Accord, the paper said.
The Basel I Accord determines the minimum proportion of their assets that large banks must set aside to guard against losses from banking risks. The more complex, risk-based Basel II Accord, which the Basel Committee hopes will come into force in late 2006, retains the 8% minimum.
The paper noted that in the US, which sets perhaps the highest requirements for banks that want to be in the well-capitalised category, large banks maintain substantial excess capital. Under US rules, well-capitalised banks must have a minimum total risk-assets ratio of 10% with a tier 1 ratio of 6%, against 4% under Basel I. Tier 1 capital is shareholders’ equity plus published reserves.
Regulators commenting on the paper said other countries might consider going down the US route.
The paper’s authors said evidence suggests that banks large enough to have a credit rating target a solvency standard that is significantly more conservative than that required by the current Basel Accord. The suggestion, said the paper, is that bank access to important credit markets like the swap markets may significantly influence the choice of a solvency standard.
“If large banks generally have to target solvency standards that are much higher than those implicit in the current Accord, to have the flexibility to carry out the type of business in which they are engaged, this may indicate that the current level is already quite low,” the paper said.
The paper, on regulatory and economic solvency standards for internationally active banks, is co-authored by Patricia Jackson, head of the UK central bank’s regulatory policy division, her colleague Victoria Saporta and William Perraudin of Birkbeck College, London. Their views do not necessarily reflect those of the Bank of England.
It was prepared for a workshop on an economic assessment of the Basel II banking Accord currently taking place in Basel, Switzerland. The workshop is organised by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the architect of the Basel accord, the Centre for Economic Policy Research and the Journal of Financial Intermediation.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Prop shops recoil from EU’s ‘ill-fitting’ capital regime
Large proprietary trading firms complain they are subject to hand-me-down rules that were originally designed for banks
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FCA presses UK non-banks to put their affairs in order
Greater scrutiny of wind-down plans by regulator could alter capital and liquidity requirements
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management