LCH snubs DTCC merger
A proposed merger between London-based derivatives clearing house LCH.Clearnet and US clearing giant, the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) has fallen through.
In December LCH.Clearnet terminated the exclusivity arrangement of the merger agreement so as to entertain a potential rival bid from a consortium of major dealers. A letter from the consortium was read by LCH.Clearnet's board in its meeting yesterday detailing the dealers' progress towards making an offer. A spokesman for the consortium said that the firms have committed to making an offer by the end of next month.
Since the consortium was first announced on February 2, the composition of the group has evolved. Initially the group included BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank - which was also acting as adviser on the acquisition - HSBC, JP Morgan, Royal Bank of Scotland, Société Générale, and UBS, along with interdealer broker Icap, while other firms such as Citi, and even the London Stock Exchange were reported to have been involved.
Currently the consortium is made up of 12 financial institutions. Deutsche Bank remains group adviser, but the spokesman declined to give the names of the other participants, except that at least three changes had been made from the original group.
See also: Dealer interest delays LCH.Clearnet and DTCC deal
LCH.Clearnet bid sparks conflict of interest fears
US and European firms in bid for LCH
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Already under FRTB, some banks hope for modelling reprieve
Risk Live: BMO and UBS opted for SA, but believe regulators could still opt to follow softer US rules
Regulators better prepared for next Credit Suisse, says SRB head
FSB strengthening guidance on international co-operation, but EU needs more mutual support
From Pillar to Pillar… to post: where now for op risk in Europe?
Experts think enhanced Pillar 2 charge informed by Dora would be more useful than a blunt Pillar 1
PRA struggles to follow Fed’s FRTB modelling moves
Market risk experts say minor differences in US rules add up to more incentives for IMA adoption
Lifeline keeps Europe’s hopes afloat for single-sided reporting
Despite Esma’s proposal for delegated reporting of trades, the industry may yet get its wish
EU’s plan to get competitive faces big legislative hurdles
Large and controversial legislative package may be too amorphous to deliver results quickly
FDIC relearns SVB lessons in resolution tinkering
Paring back requirements gets thumbs up from some, but concerns linger
Stablecoin consortia may be ‘interim’ step to solo bank issuance
Former Citi payments head and Ubyx founder says all G-Sibs will issue their own coins