
UK's FSA to tackle operational risk
The UK’s Financial Services Authority (FSA) today launched its whistle-blowing initiative, designed to encourage financial industry workers to make disclosures about malpractice in the workplace.
The FSA has set up dedicated phone lines, postal and e-mail addresses for employees who suspect colleagues of financial wrongdoing, although there is no requirement for firms to distribute the contact information.
The UK financial watchdog will encourage staff to go to their senior management in the first instance, who should then inform the FSA. Those reporting fraud, or other malpractices, will not have to disclose their identity, although they will be encouraged to do so, said the FSA.
Whistle-blowers must “believe any allegations are substantially true” and are asked to come forward as soon as possible, rather than wait to collect evidence themselves. But the annonymity of whistle-blowers, should they choose to give details, can not be assured “since circumstances may be such that the disclosure of identity becomes unavoidable in law”, the FSA said.
“Whistle-blowing is a cost-effective risk management system, and so far the financial services industry has been enormously cooperative in its support of our approach,” said Carol Seargeant, managing director of the FSA’s regulatory processes and risk directorate.
Michael Smyth, a partner at law firm Clifford Chance and chairman of whistle-blowing lobbying group Public Concern at Work, said the scheme is valuable as an “early warning system” that could be used to avoid Enron-like financial mismanagement. “The question on my mind is whether Nick Leeson’s colleagues could have alerted regulators to his fraud earlier if this initiative had been in place,” Smyth added.
Although the scheme is only intended for financial firms with a presence in the UK, Smyth said he expects other European regulators to adopt similar approaches. “Regulation is about more than just picking up the pieces after the collapse. It’s about working to avoid disasters, and self regulation is central to a firm’s success,” he added.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU tipped to tag less than 30 tech firms as critical for Dora
Irish regulator suggests European supervisors will take narrower view than some feared
Trading venues seen as easiest targets for Esma supervision
Platforms do not pose systemic risks for member states and are already subject to consistent rules
How to reform the NSFR… and why regulators may never get there
Ideas for updating funding rules after SVB include recalibration and concentration limits
BoE takes subtle leverage snipe at CCP cross-margining
Margin offsets might increase risk, but could also encourage more central clearing
Should the Fed mandate collateral pre-positioning at the discount window?
Supervisor wants banks to be ready to access central bank facilities, but formalising pre-positioning has some drawbacks
Why Basel’s push to overhaul PFE is a wake-up call for risk teams
The regulatory push, lessons from Archegos and why a unified PFE/XVA framework is becoming the new standard
SEC faces debate over possible cull of cyber security rules
Lobby groups pushing for regulator to roll back disclosures, but investors take a different view
Emir rule delay leaves Simm paperwork gathering dust
Mid-year refresh triggers Emir 3.0 authorisation process despite unfinished regulatory standards