Pension scheme re-alignment has no impact on financial risk, says actuary chief
The discontinuation of final salary pension schemes for employees will not, as many companies assert, reduce financial risk, according to Ronald Bowie, chairman of the pensions board of the UK Faculty and Institute of Actuaries.
Popular sentiment in the market at present suggests that closing final salary schemes enables companies to immediately tackle liabilities. It is widely argued that in replacing these plans with money purchase schemes, investment risk is shifted from employers to employees.
But Bowie told the House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee that regardless of current and future levels of investment in increasingly preferred money purchase pensions, employers will still have significant obligations arising from defined benefit schemes. As a result, they will be encumbered with the resulting financial risk far into the future.
Bowie added that companies that suggested otherwise were acting in a "scandalous" fashion. If, he claimed, a company discontinued a final salary scheme but continued to invest in equities, any reduction in risk would be largely insignificant. At best, the problem would remain in the background.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Banks want AML data upgrade to complement US regulatory reform
FinCEN’s proposed overhaul sparks debate on whether it will lead to smarter or weaker supervision
Industry pushes EU exchanges to solve equity post-trade frictions
Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan join calls for mandatory cash CCP interoperability
Regulatory clarity urged for CME’s single-stock futures
SEC short selling and market access rules may hamper clearing and broker participation
Imminent US shake-up of LCR slated to include discount window
Adding Fed liquidity facility to bank regulation may help overcome stigma, raise lending capacity
French regulator wants permanent changes to EU’s output floor
Push for capital relief faces resistance from supervisors in Finland and the Netherlands
Council plans take Aquis, BME out of Esma oversight
German push to exempt Deutsche Börse catches three others, according to sources
Why watering down resolution plans is a bad idea
Bank failures are inevitable; banking crises are not
BIS’s Hernández de Cos on AI, non-bank risk and tokenisation
General manager talks about how the BIS is navigating a complex global environment