
Nationalisation remedy prescribed for B&B and Fortis
The remainder of B&B’s assets and liabilities – including its mortgage book, personal loans business, headquarters, treasury assets and wholesale liabilities – will be brought under public ownership. The decision follows a similar course of action taken by the UK government in February to nationalise Northern Rock.
Alistair Darling, the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, said the move would protect B&B’s retail customers. “Following recent turbulence in global financial markets, B&B has found itself under increasing pressure as investors lost confidence in its ability to carry on as an independent institution,” Darling said. “The FSA determined on Saturday morning that the firm no longer met its threshold conditions for operating as a deposit taker under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and FSA rules.”
The transfer of retail assets to Santander will be backed by £18 billion of cash from the Treasury and the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. This will be initially funded through a short-term loan from the Bank of England, which will subsequently be replaced by a longer term government loan.
To give assurance to wholesale market institutions that have exposures to B&B, the government has put in place guarantee arrangements for six months to safeguard certain borrowings and deposits. The government is seeking state aid approval from the European Commission to extend these arrangements during the restructuring of B&B’s business.
The senior management of B&B – headed by chief executive Richard Pym – will remain in place during the initial period of public ownership.
Meanwhile, Fortis, which is listed in Brussels, Amsterdam and Luxembourg, on Sunday received an €11.2 capital injection for shares by the governments of Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg. The move came after talks to sell all or parts of its business to BNP Paribas and ING broke down.
The Belgian government is paying €4.7 billion for a 49% stake in Fortis’ Belgian banking unit; while the Netherlands and Luxembourg governments will pay €4 billion and €2.5 billion for similarly-sized holdings in the firm’s banking businesses in those countries.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU banks ‘will play for time’ in stand-off over India’s CCPs
Lawyers say banks are unlikely to set up subsidiaries and will instead pin hopes on revised Emir fix
ECB mulls intervention on uneven banking book reporting
Inconsistency among EU banks on whether deposits and loans are in scope for credit spread risk
Iosco warns of leveraged loan ‘vulnerabilities’
As recovery rates plummet, report calls for clearer covenants and more transparency on addbacks
Narrow path to compromise on EU’s post-Brexit clearing rules
Lawmakers unlikely to support industry demand to delete Emir active accounts proposal altogether
The Fed’s stress test models are inaccurate. Something has to change
First step for US regulator to improve its bank loss forecasts would be to open up its models to public scrutiny, argue two banking industry advocates
Bankers call for overhaul of EBA stress tests
Support for multiple scenarios, but only if fixed assumptions and variables are scaled back
CFTC plan to relax MMF margin restriction sparks debate
Industry welcomes proposal to lift ban on repo-using funds as eligible IM, but some warn MMFs bring risks
Legal challenges loom for renewed US focus on Sifis
Lawyers say any FSOC attempt to designate systemic non-banks risks a repeat of MetLife case