
ECB no longer accepts syndicated loans as collateral
On October 15, the ECB widened the framework of eligible collateral in an effort to facilitate access to its credit lines and boost liquidity among European banks. The Bank of England specifically excluded syndicated-loans in the range of collateral it would accept on its own credit schemes earlier last month.
Euro-dominated syndicated loans and various debt instruments would qualify under the new guidelines, while the ECB also enhanced its longer-term refinancing operations to help banks in an increasingly hostile credit environment.
However, the ECB ceased to accept syndicated loans as collateral for its credit lines on November 21, having only started to admit them on November 17. The collateral was originally intended to be eligible until the end of 2009.
The move has puzzled bankers and ratings agencies alike, particularly as the ECB is refusing to comment on why it no longer accepts the loans. One ratings agency analyst speculated the ECB may be concerned that a credit event on the loans would be out of their jurisdiction, which could cause them unnecessary problems.
"It's most mysterious," said one head of global credit strategy at a multinational bank. "You would have thought that somebody was, in their minds, abusing the system, and so they put a stop to it."
"But it could be something perfectly innocent like the ECB realised it would be difficult to price this stuff as syndicated loans never trade," he added.
An ECB official said that the bank believes it currently accepts a sufficient range of collateral to allow banks access to its liquidity schemes, begging the question why it decided to accept syndicated loans in the first place.
See also: Demand wanes for central bank liquidity schemes
Central banks promise unlimited dollar lending
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Europe’s lenders sail into uncharted waters of the banking book
Regulators are pushing banks to map their credit spread risk. Here be dragons?
SEC may lack legal clout to impose new dealer rule – Citadel
Adoption of quantitative dealer definition may require congressional changes to US Securities Exchange Act
US Basel endgame hits clearing with op risk capital charges
Dealers also fret about unlevel playing field compared with requirements in the EU
CFTC’s clearing house recovery rule splits industry
Some fear CCPs will fast-track recovery, others say any rule book will be ignored in emergency
EU banks ‘will play for time’ in stand-off over India’s CCPs
Lawyers say banks are unlikely to set up subsidiaries and will instead pin hopes on revised Emir fix
ECB mulls intervention on uneven banking book reporting
Inconsistency among EU banks on whether deposits and loans are in scope for credit spread risk
Iosco warns of leveraged loan ‘vulnerabilities’
As recovery rates plummet, report calls for clearer covenants and more transparency on addbacks
Narrow path to compromise on EU’s post-Brexit clearing rules
Lawmakers unlikely to support industry demand to delete Emir active accounts proposal altogether