
Fed to treble lending
Gus Faucher, director of macroeconomics at Economy.com, a subsidiary of rating agency Moody’s, said an expanded TAF is “not going to be enough in and of itself, but the hope is that together with all the other Fed and Treasury department moves it will be enough”.
In every auction since the inception of TAF there has been substantially greater propositions submitted than accepted. In the auction of September 22, a week after the collapse of Lehman Brothers, 85 bidders made a record $133.56 billion worth of propositions and received only $75 billion worth of funds.
The correlation between submitted and accepted propositions is expressed in a bid/cover ratio. The first TAF auctions, which took place on December 17 and December 20, 2007, recorded the highest ever bid/cover ratios at 3.08 and 2.88 respectively. On December 17, $61.54 billion worth of propositions were submitted by 93 bidders, but only $20 billion were accepted. On December 20, 73 bidders submitted $57.67 billion worth of propositions and only $20 billion were accepted.
The bid/cover ratio has generally fallen since then, with the highest ratios in 2008 coming on February 25 when 72 bidders made $67.96 billion worth of propositions, with only $30 billion of bids accepted - a bid/cover ratio of 2.27. The second highest ratio in 2008 was 2.19 recorded on August 11. But the fall is largely due to successive increases in supply rather than any drop in demand. September 22 saw a total of $133.6 billion in bids for $75 billion offered, the highest total of bids so far.
The TAF is a short term lending facility which was introduced on December 12, 2007 to try to alleviate pressures in short-term funding markets by allowing depository institutions to borrow from the Federal Reserve for a fixed term against the same collateral that is accepted at the discount window.
In Monday’s announcement, the Federal Reserve Board also said that it would begin to pay interest on the required and excess reserve balances of depository institutions. Faucher commented: “This allows Fed monetary policy to be more effective” - both by allowing the central bank to control short term rates, and by doing away with the complicated process of buying and selling securities that previously determined the Fed’s fund rate. “In combination with other efforts this will help,” he added.
Recent changes in law as a result of market turmoil have also aided this process. The Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act of 2006, which originally authorised the Federal Reserve to begin paying interest on these balances from October 1, 2011, has been overridden and replaced by this year's Emergency Economic Stabilisation Act, which brought this date forward to October 1, 2008.
See also: TAF auctions hint at liquidity improvement
Fed ramps up bank support to $75 billion
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Europe’s lenders sail into uncharted waters of the banking book
Regulators are pushing banks to map their credit spread risk. Here be dragons?
SEC may lack legal clout to impose new dealer rule – Citadel
Adoption of quantitative dealer definition may require congressional changes to US Securities Exchange Act
US Basel endgame hits clearing with op risk capital charges
Dealers also fret about unlevel playing field compared with requirements in the EU
CFTC’s clearing house recovery rule splits industry
Some fear CCPs will fast-track recovery, others say any rule book will be ignored in emergency
EU banks ‘will play for time’ in stand-off over India’s CCPs
Lawyers say banks are unlikely to set up subsidiaries and will instead pin hopes on revised Emir fix
ECB mulls intervention on uneven banking book reporting
Inconsistency among EU banks on whether deposits and loans are in scope for credit spread risk
Iosco warns of leveraged loan ‘vulnerabilities’
As recovery rates plummet, report calls for clearer covenants and more transparency on addbacks
Narrow path to compromise on EU’s post-Brexit clearing rules
Lawmakers unlikely to support industry demand to delete Emir active accounts proposal altogether