EnergyClear and Vmac to develop clearing function
Houston-based, industry-owned energy derivatives clearing house EnergyClear Corporation has entered into a letter of intent with New York-based credit risk assurance provider Virtual Markets Assurance Corporation (Vmac) to develop a program linking Vmac's 'AAA'-rated credit assurance program to EnergyClear's clearing house functions.
At present, EnergyClear, which formally launched this month, can only provide clearing functions for standard OTC products. EnergyClear currently clears monthly forward contracts for 12 power and 22 natural gas points.
But Vmac said it can provide an alternative to the traditional clearing house structure operated by EnergyClear by becoming a guarantor of bilateral contracts. Its model has already received approval from one major energy derivatives participant. TradeSpark, Cantor Fitzgerald’s online energy trading platform, is using Vmac’s model during its testing phase, which started in August.
“The clearing product is important to the efficiency of the energy market since capital is very expensive in this sector,” said Wallace Turbeville, Vmac chief executive and a former Goldman Sachs energy trader. “Since clearing allows for multilateral netting of risks, it can reduce the demand for capital by between 80% and 90%," Turbeville added. In the energy market, many firms are raising capital at very high cost and reducing trading activity to lower perceived risk. Clearing is a far better way to address this issue.”
Vmac, which is part-owned by AAA-rated monoline insurer Financial Security Assurance (FSA), aggregates contract obligations that are guaranteed by FSA up to an agreed value, which is marked-to-market over time. While bonds are not issued, as the obligations are unfunded, the effect is similar. FSA also syndicates the risk into the reinsurance and credit derivatives markets.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
From Pillar to Pillar… to post: where now for op risk in Europe?
Experts think enhanced Pillar 2 charge informed by Dora would be more useful than a blunt Pillar 1
PRA struggles to follow Fed’s FRTB modelling moves
Market risk experts say minor differences in US rules add up to more incentives for IMA adoption
Lifeline keeps Europe’s hopes afloat for single-sided reporting
Despite Esma’s proposal for delegated reporting of trades, the industry may yet get its wish
EU’s plan to get competitive faces big legislative hurdles
Large and controversial legislative package may be too amorphous to deliver results quickly
FDIC relearns SVB lessons in resolution tinkering
Paring back requirements gets thumbs up from some, but concerns linger
Stablecoin consortia may be ‘interim’ step to solo bank issuance
Former Citi payments head and Ubyx founder says all G-Sibs will issue their own coins
Report once: will Esma’s €1bn reforms deliver the full picture?
Critics say plan to merge three reporting regimes will see scant returns, and won’t mesh with single-sided reporting
CFTC accused of ‘double standards’ on compute futures
Duffy questions ‘long review’ of CME’s contract when Kalshi already offers similar product