SEC brings landmark case against teenage hacker
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a complaint against a teenager that it alleges perpetrated a complex options scam. This is the first time the US regulator has brought a securities fraud case against an alleged hacker.
The end result, the SEC claimed, is that Dinh was able to dodge $37,000 in trading losses by causing the victim to unknowingly purchase put options referenced on the stock of California-based networking technology specialist Cisco Systems.
SEC Office of Internet Enforcement chief John Reed Stark said investors need to review their brokerage statements carefully every month and be wary of downloads. They should take security measures, he added, “such as using an anti-virus shield and employing a firewall... to avoid computer viruses, worms and other intrusion programs".
The SEC claims Dinh attempted to conceal his identity through the use of online aliases, multiple e-mail accounts, foreign internet service providers and anonymous websites. According to the regulator’s filing, during July 2003, Dinh sent an e-mail inviting users of an online stock discussion forum to test a new stock-charting tool.
However, this tool was actually a disguised version of a keystroke-logging program dubbed 'The Beast'. This allowed Dinh to monitor remotely the computer activity of users who had downloaded the tool. Dinh, the SEC claims, employed this program to obtain the login and password information for the victim's TD Waterhouse online brokerage account.
Next, on the morning of July 11, Dinh placed through his own online brokerage account orders to sell his option contracts at $5 per contract, and corresponding buy orders through the victim's account. As a result, Dinh caused the unsuspecting account holder to purchase 7,200 option contracts.
In a related action, Dinh was charged by the US Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts with securities fraud, mail and wire fraud, and causing damage in connection with unauthorised access to a protected computer.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma denies need for new competitiveness mandate
MEP wants explicit requirement; Esma official says it’s already covered in existing rulebook
US regulators cut FRTB’s IMA capital hit by 59%, Isda finds
Trade body pushes for further changes to cross-product netting, default risk charge
US FRTB glitch could spit out negative capital charges
Effort to recognise risk diversification between IMA and standardised approach went too far
Euronext, LCH back Esma as exchange super-regulator
National oversight hurts Europe, exchange officials say – but some are not ready to accept a single watchdog
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive