Structured products in the spotlight
Concerns over the mis-selling of structured products to investors in the US have prompted the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) to issue guidelines to ensure members fall within the scope of sales practice codes.
"This guidance is intended to advise firms about how they might go about making sure they are not in danger of violating the sales practices because of some confusion, perhaps about how to treat these products," said a spokesperson for the private sector body in Washington DC.
The guidelines were issued to members last Monday after the NASD conducted a review of its members that sell structured products. The assessment revealed that some of its members may be falling short of meeting 'sales practice obligations' when selling the products, particularly to the retail client base. These obligations include providing fair, balanced and accurate disclosure in promotional material, and complying with suitability obligations.
"We have determined, at least for the time being, that the existing regulatory structure and requirements we have in place provide the necessary tools to address firm conduct and for them to address their own conduct with respect to the sale of these products," said Gary Goldsholle, associate vice-president and associate general counsel, office of general counsel, regulatory policy and oversight in Washington DC. "Given there were some shortcomings in certain areas, we thought it would be helpful to guide firms' conduct towards where we believe it should be."
The NASD uses a broad definition of structured products as securities derived from, or based on, a single security, a basket of securities or an index. The products can offer either full protection of the invested principal, or limited or no protection of principal.
One head of structured products said some of the recommendations are unnecessary. "I like best practices but I think this goes over the line and I'm not sure it was well thought-out or well run by people," he said.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack