
US and European firms in bid for LCH
An official representing the transatlantic consortium told Risk the group also includes BNP Paribas, Société Générale, UBS, JP Morgan, HSBC and Royal Bank of Scotland, along with interdealer broker Icap, which confirmed its involvement on February 2.
He added a small number of other major banks are also involved, with more firms interested in participating, but declined to give names.
Increased market turbulence and counterparty risk concerns have pushed clearing services into the spotlight since the early part of last year. In particular, regulators in Europe and the US view central clearing for credit derivatives as critically important for financial stability.
LCH.Clearnet has 109 clearing members and is 73.3% user owned, but the group wants the clearing house to be owned and run by a smaller number of active players.
Additionally, the consortium wants to break up a non-binding merger agreement for LCH.Clearnet signed on October 22, 2008 with US clearing giant, the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC). Concerns have been raised that a merger of the US and UK firms would stifle competition in the clearing space.
To date, no formal bid or timeframe has been set by the consortium. However, any proposition would need to be greater than the price agreed with the DTCC, which gave LCH.Clearnet an implied equity value of €739 million, or up to €10 a share. That deal is due to be completed on March 15, unless a counter offer is made.
See also: The fight is on for LCH
DTCC and LCH.Clearnet plan €739 million merger
Breath of Liffe
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU banks ‘will play for time’ in stand-off over India’s CCPs
Lawyers say banks are unlikely to set up subsidiaries and will instead pin hopes on revised Emir fix
ECB mulls intervention on uneven banking book reporting
Inconsistency among EU banks on whether deposits and loans are in scope for credit spread risk
Iosco warns of leveraged loan ‘vulnerabilities’
As recovery rates plummet, report calls for clearer covenants and more transparency on addbacks
Narrow path to compromise on EU’s post-Brexit clearing rules
Lawmakers unlikely to support industry demand to delete Emir active accounts proposal altogether
The Fed’s stress test models are inaccurate. Something has to change
First step for US regulator to improve its bank loss forecasts would be to open up its models to public scrutiny, argue two banking industry advocates
Bankers call for overhaul of EBA stress tests
Support for multiple scenarios, but only if fixed assumptions and variables are scaled back
CFTC plan to relax MMF margin restriction sparks debate
Industry welcomes proposal to lift ban on repo-using funds as eligible IM, but some warn MMFs bring risks
Legal challenges loom for renewed US focus on Sifis
Lawyers say any FSOC attempt to designate systemic non-banks risks a repeat of MetLife case