Russian derivatives legislation effort stalls
Efforts to fast-track the introduction of new legislation in Russia to provide legal certainty for derivatives contracts appear to have failed, following a hearing on the subject at the Russian Federation state duma on September 27.
But progress to change article 1062 of Russia’s Civil Code, which underpinned the decision by the country’s Supreme Arbitration Court to rule that non-deliverable forward contracts are illegal, has proven slow. Presidential elections on March 14 have also contributed to delays. But derivatives legislation experts such as Sergei Avramov, a Moscow-based associate at US law firm Coudert Brothers, hoped the September hearings would kick-start a process that has already dragged on for more than two years.
However, this seems to have failed. “Things are pretty much as they were,” says Simon Vine, deputy head of investment banking at Alfa Bank. “I see no real progress.” And Deutsche Bank analysts agree. “We remain worried about the structural reform and political outlook,” the bank said in a Russian market research report on September 29. “Judicial reform... is on hold.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous