Russian derivatives legislation effort stalls
Efforts to fast-track the introduction of new legislation in Russia to provide legal certainty for derivatives contracts appear to have failed, following a hearing on the subject at the Russian Federation state duma on September 27.
But progress to change article 1062 of Russia’s Civil Code, which underpinned the decision by the country’s Supreme Arbitration Court to rule that non-deliverable forward contracts are illegal, has proven slow. Presidential elections on March 14 have also contributed to delays. But derivatives legislation experts such as Sergei Avramov, a Moscow-based associate at US law firm Coudert Brothers, hoped the September hearings would kick-start a process that has already dragged on for more than two years.
However, this seems to have failed. “Things are pretty much as they were,” says Simon Vine, deputy head of investment banking at Alfa Bank. “I see no real progress.” And Deutsche Bank analysts agree. “We remain worried about the structural reform and political outlook,” the bank said in a Russian market research report on September 29. “Judicial reform... is on hold.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack