Russian derivatives legislation effort stalls
Efforts to fast-track the introduction of new legislation in Russia to provide legal certainty for derivatives contracts appear to have failed, following a hearing on the subject at the Russian Federation state duma on September 27.
But progress to change article 1062 of Russia’s Civil Code, which underpinned the decision by the country’s Supreme Arbitration Court to rule that non-deliverable forward contracts are illegal, has proven slow. Presidential elections on March 14 have also contributed to delays. But derivatives legislation experts such as Sergei Avramov, a Moscow-based associate at US law firm Coudert Brothers, hoped the September hearings would kick-start a process that has already dragged on for more than two years.
However, this seems to have failed. “Things are pretty much as they were,” says Simon Vine, deputy head of investment banking at Alfa Bank. “I see no real progress.” And Deutsche Bank analysts agree. “We remain worried about the structural reform and political outlook,” the bank said in a Russian market research report on September 29. “Judicial reform... is on hold.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga