Sarbanes grills Brickell over Ofheo nomination
The US Senate Banking Committee held a hearing on Mark Brickell’s nomination for director of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (Ofheo), the regulator for government-sponsored enterprises (GSE) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, this afternoon. Brickell, former managing director at JP Morgan and more recently chief executive of electronic derivatives exchange Blackbird, faced hard questions about whether his work as an anti-regulation derivatives industry lobbyist should keep him from running Ofheo at a time when the GSEs are under fire for their derivatives use and accounting.
Sarbanes asked Brickell if he still believed, as he said in a 2000 letter to Ofheo, that the GSEs should be allowed to use internal models to set regulatory capital – a position Ofheo rejected in favour of using its own model. Brickell said he was merely trying to put forward some helpful ideas at the time on best practices. He added: “A rigid regime is not a tough regime. It gives [regulated entities] opportunities for regulatory arbitrage, which thwarts the purpose of the capital rules.”
Sarbanes also noted that Brickell opposed the passage of US fair value derivatives accounting standard FAS 133, and asked Brickell if he still opposed it. Brickell responded that he would enforce it as the “law of the land”. But Sarbanes was not satisfied; he pressed Brickell for an answer on whether he thought FAS 133 was a good or bad rule. “Sir, I don’t think it’s open to question by the director of Ofheo,” Brickell said. “I think it’s a great rule because it’s part of GAAP.”
But Sarbanes remained unsatisfied: “We had another nominee before us that never got confirmed because she said she did not have a view on the appropriate regulatory framework. Most [potential regulators] don’t come in with that attitude – they have a role in forming the regulation, so it’s important to know your position on the issues.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Change fatigue could dim EBA’s credit risk simplicity drive
Revisions may be kept to a minimum as short-term implementation burden weighs on banks
Foreign banks can swerve US Basel op risk capital charges
New proposal offers category III and IV banks op-out from regime, but intragroup trades penalised
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules
DRW chief slams ‘ridiculous’ OCC stablecoin rule
Isda AGM: Wilson warns week-long redemption freeze would deter use of Genius Act coins as cash leg of tokenised repo
Dealers push for more revisions to Basel III endgame
Isda AGM: Goldman, JP Morgan bankers want changes on cross-product netting, CVA and default risk charges
StanChart: UK, EU should copy US ‘commercial’ Basel III
Isda AGM: Exec warns divergent Basel III rules will push trading into less-regulated entities
NBFI oversight ‘no longer adequate’, say BdF economists
Researchers call for stronger supervision of non-bank sector ‘before risks actually materialise’
Why Brexit still stirs up trouble for cross-border business
As EU erects another obstacle, banks consider ways around it – or exit strategies