Sarbanes grills Brickell over Ofheo nomination
The US Senate Banking Committee held a hearing on Mark Brickell’s nomination for director of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (Ofheo), the regulator for government-sponsored enterprises (GSE) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, this afternoon. Brickell, former managing director at JP Morgan and more recently chief executive of electronic derivatives exchange Blackbird, faced hard questions about whether his work as an anti-regulation derivatives industry lobbyist should keep him from running Ofheo at a time when the GSEs are under fire for their derivatives use and accounting.
Sarbanes asked Brickell if he still believed, as he said in a 2000 letter to Ofheo, that the GSEs should be allowed to use internal models to set regulatory capital – a position Ofheo rejected in favour of using its own model. Brickell said he was merely trying to put forward some helpful ideas at the time on best practices. He added: “A rigid regime is not a tough regime. It gives [regulated entities] opportunities for regulatory arbitrage, which thwarts the purpose of the capital rules.”
Sarbanes also noted that Brickell opposed the passage of US fair value derivatives accounting standard FAS 133, and asked Brickell if he still opposed it. Brickell responded that he would enforce it as the “law of the land”. But Sarbanes was not satisfied; he pressed Brickell for an answer on whether he thought FAS 133 was a good or bad rule. “Sir, I don’t think it’s open to question by the director of Ofheo,” Brickell said. “I think it’s a great rule because it’s part of GAAP.”
But Sarbanes remained unsatisfied: “We had another nominee before us that never got confirmed because she said she did not have a view on the appropriate regulatory framework. Most [potential regulators] don’t come in with that attitude – they have a role in forming the regulation, so it’s important to know your position on the issues.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma denies need for new competitiveness mandate
MEP wants explicit requirement; Esma official says it’s already covered in existing rulebook
US regulators cut FRTB’s IMA capital hit by 59%, Isda finds
Trade body pushes for further changes to cross-product netting, default risk charge
US FRTB glitch could spit out negative capital charges
Effort to recognise risk diversification between IMA and standardised approach went too far
Euronext, LCH back Esma as exchange super-regulator
National oversight hurts Europe, exchange officials say – but some are not ready to accept a single watchdog
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive