
Basel experts agree securitisation treatment
Technical experts with the Capital Task Force, the senior sub-grouping of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, agreed the details at a meeting in London that concluded late yesterday, a day ahead of schedule, banking regulators said.
The task force’s proposals will now go for final approval by the Basel Committee at its mid-September meeting in Cape Town in two weeks’ time.
The proposals will be set out in a working paper on asset securitisation that is now likely to be issued on October 1, the date on which more than 300 banks in some 40 countries will also receive the key third Basel II quantitative impact survey, or QIS 3. The Basel Committee also plans to issue a non-technical overview of the Basel II accord on October 1.
The Capital Task Force agreed, among other things, a formula whereby bank regulators can assess the creditworthiness of a loan securitisation where the securitisation has not got a rating from credit rating agencies.
The prudential way of treating an unrated securitisation issue would be for regulators to require banks investing in them to put up protective capital amounting to 100% of the value of the issue to guard against any losses from the default or non-payment of the loans and credits underlying the issue.
But the formula will enable regulators to assign risk weightings to the securitisation so that the amount of protective capital can more accurately match the risks actually faced by the bank. The higher the creditworthiness of the issue, the lower its risk weighting and the less the capital charges required by the regulators.
Meanwhile, the Basel Committee’s risk management sub-group will hold a two-day meeting in Paris on September 11 and 12 to put uncontroversial finishing touches to QIS 3 as it applies to the operational risk aspects of Basel II.
QIS 3 will seek information from the banks on how they will be affected by Basel II, which the regulators want to apply to large, international banks from late 2006.
On October 1, banks will be given the risk-weight functions and formulas they need to apply to the information they are now collecting for draft spreadsheets issued to them by the Basel Committee in July. The committee will want QIS 3 replies by December 20.
Banks will be able to gauge fairly accurately from QIS 3 the final shape of Basel II as envisaged by the Basel supervisors. The committee will also issue on October 1 an overview of progress with the accord.
Regulators hope to issue their third Basel II consultative paper, or CP 3, for industry comment in May next year. They expect to publish the final version of Basel II in late 2003, allowing some three years for banks and their regulators to ready themselves for implementation in late 2006.
David Keefe
For similar articles please visit www.BaselAlert.com - an indispensable source of news, comment and analysis on the development of the Basel II accord and banking supervision. The site contains a searchable archive of news, articles and technical papers, and a free monthly e-mail summary. Click here for a free trial.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Europe’s lenders sail into uncharted waters of the banking book
Regulators are pushing banks to map their credit spread risk. Here be dragons?
SEC may lack legal clout to impose new dealer rule – Citadel
Adoption of quantitative dealer definition may require congressional changes to US Securities Exchange Act
US Basel endgame hits clearing with op risk capital charges
Dealers also fret about unlevel playing field compared with requirements in the EU
CFTC’s clearing house recovery rule splits industry
Some fear CCPs will fast-track recovery, others say any rule book will be ignored in emergency
EU banks ‘will play for time’ in stand-off over India’s CCPs
Lawyers say banks are unlikely to set up subsidiaries and will instead pin hopes on revised Emir fix
ECB mulls intervention on uneven banking book reporting
Inconsistency among EU banks on whether deposits and loans are in scope for credit spread risk
Iosco warns of leveraged loan ‘vulnerabilities’
As recovery rates plummet, report calls for clearer covenants and more transparency on addbacks
Narrow path to compromise on EU’s post-Brexit clearing rules
Lawmakers unlikely to support industry demand to delete Emir active accounts proposal altogether