Risk linked with Asian banks ‘mispriced’, says RBS
The credit risk associated with Asian banks is being mispriced by the financial markets and the region’s relatively stronger credit outlook, compared with Europe and the US, makes bank debt potentially an attractive investment opportunity, according to research by Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS).
RBS estimates that Asian banks account for 2%, or $2.8 billion, of the global $140 billion in write-downs linked to exposures from subprime and collateralised debt obligation. “Just two banks in Asia have experienced negative ratings actions as a result of the crisis,” the report said. These banks are Japan’s Mizuho and Hong Kong’s Citic Ka Wah Bank.
The UK bank’s credit research team believes Asian bank debt will outperform Asian high yield corporate and sovereign debt as well as European and US bank debt in 2008.
The report, released on February 6, added that bank exposure to monocline insurers is similarly limited compared with the exposures of financial institutions in Europe and the US. Monocline insurers are used by market participants to wrap credit instruments to bolster the credit rating of structured instruments.
Large monolines like Ambac, MBIA and FSA are expected to lose their triple-A ratings unless they receive a bail out by a consortium of the world’s leading banks aimed at bolstering their flagging capital positions.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack