Risk linked with Asian banks ‘mispriced’, says RBS
The credit risk associated with Asian banks is being mispriced by the financial markets and the region’s relatively stronger credit outlook, compared with Europe and the US, makes bank debt potentially an attractive investment opportunity, according to research by Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS).
RBS estimates that Asian banks account for 2%, or $2.8 billion, of the global $140 billion in write-downs linked to exposures from subprime and collateralised debt obligation. “Just two banks in Asia have experienced negative ratings actions as a result of the crisis,” the report said. These banks are Japan’s Mizuho and Hong Kong’s Citic Ka Wah Bank.
The UK bank’s credit research team believes Asian bank debt will outperform Asian high yield corporate and sovereign debt as well as European and US bank debt in 2008.
The report, released on February 6, added that bank exposure to monocline insurers is similarly limited compared with the exposures of financial institutions in Europe and the US. Monocline insurers are used by market participants to wrap credit instruments to bolster the credit rating of structured instruments.
Large monolines like Ambac, MBIA and FSA are expected to lose their triple-A ratings unless they receive a bail out by a consortium of the world’s leading banks aimed at bolstering their flagging capital positions.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs