French finance ministry releases SG post mortem
The French finance ministry called for better risk management and oversight at Société Générale (SG), and heavier fines for non-compliant banks, in a preliminary report issued today.
Although SG informed regulators - the Bank of France and the stock market regulator, the AMF - on Sunday, January 20, the ministry was not informed until the morning of Wednesday, January 23. The two regulators decided there was too much risk of a leak from the finance ministry to the public, the report says, adding "it would without doubt have been desirable for the government to be informed earlier".
In a list of possible changes, the ministry said SG should have monitored nominal positions as well as net positions, kept a closer eye on margin calls and payments, investigated more fully after the first warning from the Eurex exchange in November 2007 and confirmed trades more rapidly.
Given the cost of making these improvements, the ministry also said it needed the power to impose much heavier fines for non-compliance - at present it is limited to a maximum of €5 million, which is too small compared with the cost of compliance to give banks an incentive to improve.
The full report is available online from the finance ministry at www.minefe.gouv.fr.
See also: Escoffier credits customer support for SG
SG gives details of fraud, but questions remain
Shake-up at SG follows rogue trader losses
"He didn't want to tell the truth immediately"
€4.9 billion fraud at Société Générale
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision, along with MarketAxess
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules