Poste Italiane to sue JP Morgan Chase
Two months after Risk broke the story of Poste Italiane’s derivatives losses as a result of exotic transactions with JP Morgan Chase and other banks, the large Italian state-owned post and financial services company is suing the US bank for €40 million.
Since Risk’s story was published, it has emerged that Catasta exceeded his mandate to hedge against currency and interest rate fluctuations for Poste using contracts with notionals not exceeding €50m. He has now been dismissed.
In its writ, Poste Italiane alleges that JP Morgan Chase was at fault by not checking Catasta’s authority before signing contracts with him for barrier quanto swap transactions linked to US interest rates. Not only were these transactions much bigger than Catasta’s notional limit, but they appear to have been highly speculative in nature. The lawsuit is likely to embarrass the US bank since it has recently been engaged by the Italian Treasury to advise on the reform of Cassa Depositi e Prestiti, the Rome-based public financing body that has a 35% ownership stake in Poste Italiane.
A JP Morgan Chase spokesman confirmed that the bank had received a writ from Poste Italiane, but was unable to comment as the document was still under review. Poste Italiane also declined to comment.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack