
GSEs plan $2 trillion in US mortgage purchases
Under the terms of the plan, OFHEO will permit a large portion of the GSEs’ 30% capital requirement surplus to be invested in mortgages and MBS, although both Fannie and Freddie insist that such funding will be provided by raising additional capital and that both companies will maintain overall capital levels greater than OFHEO-mandated requirements.
OFHEO estimates that Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s existing capabilities, combined with the new initiative and the relaxation of the GSEs' portfolio caps announced in February, should allow the firms to purchase or guarantee about $2 trillion of mortgages this year.
“Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have played a very important and beneficial role in the mortgage markets over the last year, but let me be clear, both companies have prudent cushions above the OFHEO-directed capital requirements and have increased their reserves,” said OFHEO director James Lockhart.
"We believe they can play an even more positive role in providing the stability and liquidity the markets need right now. OFHEO will remain vigilant in supervising the safe and sound operations of these companies, and will act quickly to address any deficiencies that may arise,” he added.
See also:
Freddie Mac to bolster capital requirements
Freddie Mac sells $6bn in stock to ward off capital fears
Fannie Mae most active CDS in US for November
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Europe’s lenders sail into uncharted waters of the banking book
Regulators are pushing banks to map their credit spread risk. Here be dragons?
SEC may lack legal clout to impose new dealer rule – Citadel
Adoption of quantitative dealer definition may require congressional changes to US Securities Exchange Act
US Basel endgame hits clearing with op risk capital charges
Dealers also fret about unlevel playing field compared with requirements in the EU
CFTC’s clearing house recovery rule splits industry
Some fear CCPs will fast-track recovery, others say any rule book will be ignored in emergency
EU banks ‘will play for time’ in stand-off over India’s CCPs
Lawyers say banks are unlikely to set up subsidiaries and will instead pin hopes on revised Emir fix
ECB mulls intervention on uneven banking book reporting
Inconsistency among EU banks on whether deposits and loans are in scope for credit spread risk
Iosco warns of leveraged loan ‘vulnerabilities’
As recovery rates plummet, report calls for clearer covenants and more transparency on addbacks
Narrow path to compromise on EU’s post-Brexit clearing rules
Lawmakers unlikely to support industry demand to delete Emir active accounts proposal altogether