US/Canadian blackouts 'could have been avoided'
Blackouts in the US that have left 50 million people without power would probably have been avoided had delayed reliability legislation been passed several years ago, according to the CEO and president of the North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC), Michehl Gent.
Gent’s agency is ultimately responsible for preventing these blackouts – NERC was formed in 1965 following a widespread power outage in the northeast – and Gent says he is personally embarrassed and upset by the disaster. He has been campaigning for five years for a federal mandate that would see NERC transformed into the North American Electric Reliability Organisation (NAERO) and would give it powers to enforce its reliability rules across the US. The legislation promoting this is presently with Congress, as part of the Energy Bill.
The cause of the outage, which saw more than 100 power plants tripping out of the system, is yet to be determined. NERC is assembling a task force of industry experts, in conjunction with the Department of Homeland Security, FERC and the Department of Energy, to investigate the matter, although it is expected to be several months before the exact details of the cascading system failure are known.
According to New Mexico governor Bill Richardson, former US secretary of energy: “[The US has] a third world grid that needs to be modernised – that is antiquated."
But Gent refuted these comments, saying: “We have the finest grid in the world. But what is needed is more investigation into digital tools which will allow us to utilise it better.”
According to the chief executive officer of consultants R. J Rudden Associates, Richard Rudden, there is “no clear, coordinated set of guidelines to govern the development and operation of the nation’s transmission grid. The cascading events of August 14th are not simply a regional anomaly, but underscore a potentially broader industry problem, and the need for national consensus.”
A recent report released by Rudden Associates states that electric utilities and transmission owners should be spending about $63 billion for distribution improvements, and about $25 billion for transmission improvements, over the next five years. These 2002-2005 spending requirements average out to be about $13.6 billion and $5.3 billion a year, respectively, for 2002-2005.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos